285
New Study Confirms Medicare for All Would Save 114,000 Lives and more than $1 Trillion a Year
(www.sanders.senate.gov)
Where's the study link?
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
285 points (99.3% liked)
politics
30739 readers
2566 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It's the last link in the article.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358689v1
Oh, I am sorry I missed that, thank you for the link and also pointing it out so I could see where I dropped the ball!
No problem. :)
But company profits go down.
It would SAVE Money? For the WORKING Class? That sounds TERRIBLE!
-Republicans making $20000 a Year!
They are just temporarily embarrassed centimillionaires.
"That's socialism!"
- Person whose life would be drastically improve is Medicare for All
Missed some zeroes I think.
No. It's accurate. They're the kind of people who think of themselves as temporarily embarrassed millionaires, and they'll be damned if their hard-earned future money goes to the poor when they finally strike it rich.
One of the things imprinted from my young life was sitting in my friend's house. I was maybe 8 or 9? Anyway, we were waiting for something else to come on like Happy Days or Dukes of Hazzard or something. These were the days of most households having one TV, maybe color if that family splurged and about 2-3 channels, LOL.
His parents were watching some local debate between two local candidates, possibly on PBS? The young guy struck me as a bit of a dumbass and had kind of slimey used car salesman vibes and the older guy seemed to be talking sense. Don't really remember many details, and hell, I was a kid anyway.
Thing winds up and my friend's dad is red-faced with anger over it and is growling about how the older guy will "raise my taxes!".
Did I say we were sitting in my friend's house? I left out the part that he lived in a trailer. My friend was poor, as was I - both our parents had bought large amounts of land in remote areas and put cheap houses on them. It is not likely at all that we were going to have our taxes raised in any way we'd really notice. I remember asking my parents about this reaction and I remember them laughing at the absurdity...
I believe they're talking "Republican (electorate)", not "Republican (elected)"
And imagine how well the nonprofit hospitals would be doing since we'd actually be getting paid
But That's a trillion not going directly into billionaire pockets
Came here to say this - also, saving people that are not billionaires just means more mouths to feed.
Yes, but billionaires need superyachts and rocket ships. Won’t someone please think of the billionaires?!
"Mess with the best, die like the rest"
What’s fucked up is they could probably have those, too.
They absolutely could. "Who will pay for it?" is the Orwellian slogan they feed to the plebs. It's really about control.
Billionaires need their heads separated from their bodies. Nothing more.
Okay, but those savings of $1 trillion could in principle be used (in part) for more superyachts and such for billionaires.
It's only specifically those billionaires who are heavily invested into the health care industry who might stand to profit from maintaining the status quo.
In other words, fascism is killing 114k people every single year.
It's actually capitalism why we have fascism.
In fairness, properly regulated capitalism is doing a bit better in many places.
I'm pretty sure that's just a blip, a temporary roadblock on capitalism's path in those places. It'll only last until the right, or rather, the wrong people gain political power in those regions -- something that capitalists work towards endlessly. Once some morally flexible political elements gain power, the wealthy who put put those elements in place, will simply bribe them into deregulating everything they can which will allow capitalism to run its natural course.
Things looked pretty good in the USA for a long time too. Then the capitalists started supporting political candidates that convinced the public that the very regulations that protected people and the environment were really bad things that were hurting people. They got voters to believe that deregulation would allow everyone to be millionaires and everything would be puppies and butterflies forever.
We all know what deregulation really led to, of course. But as the saying goes, it's far easier to fool a person than it is to convince them they've been fooled. Getting people to admit they were fooled, especially against an endless barrage of propaganda from the capitalists, has been seemingly impossible. The fools, supported by their capitalist masters, are clinging to power and blocking all efforts to fix our problems. Probably because if the problems do get fixed, it'll be the final proof that the fools were fooled in the first place, and they can't allow that. They'd rather live out their days in squalor, breathing poison until they finally lay down in the graves they've dug for us all.
Well, first of all, I agree pretty much with everything you said, basically. lol.
I'm not sure, though, that I've seen a better system than regulated capitalism anywhere. I think the countries that are doing the best in the world right now are just that, and that deregulation and just flat out oligarchial corruption is the problem in the US more than the foundation of capitalism.
And I explicitely agree that there is constant pressure toward that corruption. Countries have to constantly fight to keep it at bay, or perhaps they lose progress and have to fight to regain progress.
I just haven't seen anything that works better. Like how I've heard it said "Representative democracy is the worst form of government… except all the others." heh
Or capitalism. Overlap is like 90% these days.
No, it's much much higher. In the millions or tens of millions.
This point deserves repeating even though it may be common knowledge among those who are well informed on the issue; people in red states hate the cost of healthcare also, but they might not care to listen to Bernie about it. So the more people talking about it the better
That's why I want the study link.
But DEATH PANELS!...and Freedom!
We have death panels. It's the insurance companies.
No, those don't count because something something free enterprise marketplace miracles.
They definitely don't count… all the people they kill. bah-dum-tiss
This is just too much common sense. A plan, to save money and actually help average Americans. I wonder if life would be positively different if Bernie had won the 2016 Democratic primary.
He has pretty much 0% chance at presidency now and hes the only senator i hear talking about actual progressive ideas instead of isreli talking points.
I can almost guarantee if he won we would be in a much better place (before trump tore the whole thing down again or something)
Oh yah I agree. Shame really. He has been the consistent voice of reason and actually putting forth ideas that would actually help people. Everyone else sans a few progressives are basically all spouting the same bullshit with no real gumption to make positive change.