this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
222 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30739 readers
3298 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

They’re so desperate to make old people work, maybe if healthcare was free they could work till they’re 80

[–] Octavio@piefed.social 5 points 2 hours ago

I came here to impress everyone with my brilliant insight that the $1 trillion saved is what's currently going to the insurance companies as profit and that's why their fighting it so hard.

Imagine my surprise when everyone already knew that. Some smart cookies on here..

[–] inmate_p01135809@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I think the main issue for insurance companies here is that the $1 Trillion savings would be going to everyday people.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This is one of the ones I can't follow. Even if the end goal is to literally exploit everyone for the greatest amount of money, it would make sense investing in them living longer, so to extract more value.

So one has to assume the suffering is intentional, too.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 hours ago

one has to assume the suffering is intentional

That, and the system is fixated so much on short term profits that they willingly forego much higher long term profits.

CEOs and the like are hired and fired based on recent and shortly upcoming fiscal quarters, not long term stability.

TL;DR: Capitalism is a death cult that kills the exploiters as well as the exploited. Just not fast enough.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That money is for the insurance companies silly

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Right? How else will the rich get richer if they don’t take more and more of our money?

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

However, it’s not just elected Republicans standing the way of a transition to universal healthcare in the United States. As a Monday analysis from the investigative outlet Sludge shows, the health insurance industry is pouring money into Third Way, a think tank reportedly preparing to spend $15 million combating the rise of candidates who support progressive policies including Medicare for All.

Ah, Third Way. The political ideology of 90s Liberal wonks. You're in the wrong century, assholes.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Third Way. The political ideology of 90s Liberal wonks. You're in the wrong century, assholes.

The centrists in charge of the DNC need to get out of the way immediately.

With their ratchet effect tactics, gaslighting, and stubborn refusal to ever choose the wants and needs of the majority over those of their owner donors, they are as much to blame for the rise of fascism as the fascist leaders themselves.

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago

But it worked exactly one time for Bill Clinton. I mean we’ve tried it a dozen times since then to failure, but I’ve got a really good feeling about this next one.

You see it’s quite simple really, we can get Liz Cheney and, hmm, who else is popular with the right these days, maybe that up and comer Fetterman. Yea, have our candidate “pivot to the center” and pull in some “Biden Republicans”

Maybe during the primaries we can knee cap the most popular candidate with the most energetic base. We can run non stop scare mongering about them in friendly media outlets, talk about “electability,” and hey, if push comes to shove we can let the voting public know they’d be throwing their votes away because our chosen third way candidate is already way ahead because of pledged super delegates.

Then we can focus group the hell out of the messaging until it’s a completely bland melange of effectively nothing but empty platitudes guaranteed not to upset anyone. Some vague nod to things maybe getting better but make sure to steer clear of any Republican third rails, and if they make new third rails out of proposed legislation, tack hard away from it, avoid controversy as much as possible. They say the green new deal is socialism, we agree and say only fringe lunatics in the party want that and we are much happier with a public private partnership that can ensure healthy profits and a healthy planet. Sounds great, I mean the private corporations are already calling the shots so after taking all those bribes cough I mean campaign contributions, they will want to see a healthy return.

Yep certainly this time we will be able to cozy up to big money donors, pivot to the middle, spend most of our time courting Republican voters who routinely refer to us as baby eating demons (we are one well polished message away from swaying those votes, I can feel it) and the base will have to turn out anyways. If they sit on their hands we could get a super duper trump, and so we will put that gun to their heads and say “you have to vote blue no matter who” and then bitch and moan about how the stupid voters are just too damn stupid to see the brilliant and absolutely flawless strategy of our clintonian triangulation.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

The Epstein class doesn't want us peons to live long and healthy lives.

[–] dektep@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

the regime wants to reduce population to just 100 million

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

Harder to make money if people live, though. /s

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I need to shout this from the roof tops every time I see a Medicare-for-all story. Medicare isn't cheap. Cheaper than regular insurance? Yes. But we should be demanding healthcare as a right, paid for by the taxes we already pay and the taxes rich people and corporations SHOULD be paying. Zero cost, not more affordable.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Medicare isn't cheap

Under the current system, no.

we should be demanding healthcare as a right, paid for by the taxes we already pay and the taxes rich people and corporations SHOULD be paying. Zero cost, not more affordable.

That's basically what M4A is: single payer (AKA paid for via taxes) free at point of service healthcare for everyone.

It's not the CURRENT Medicare system for everyone, as you seem to think.