this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
91 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

12037 readers
2729 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 49 minutes ago

What's with the assumption that the pedestrian getting to their destination is less important than all the drivers? If a bunch of people get held up a long time for a smaller number of people, blame the city planners.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 31 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's a 6 lane road. You must be perpetually on steroids to think that would be normal.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 15 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

Stroad, it's a stroad. It's why I hate North America.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

A left turn lane, a right turn, and a through lane is normal? Anything else allows endless backups. Pedestrians prevent cars from turning right and left, and oncoming prevents cars from turning left, and than no one can go straight either.

It’s usually 2 lanes each way only 100m or so before the intersection and it widens to this configuration. A single lane road still usually has one type of turning lane at all intersection as well.

What are you even complaining about?

[–] wetsoggybread@lemmy.world 13 points 40 minutes ago

Oh hey I recognize that street and that guy. He's a free-stater nutjob who has at least one criminal investigation against him

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

It's not wrong in the sense that an idling combustion engine is more polluting that one maintaining a speed. An ideal intersection is where all cars can smoothly interact without stopping, something only possible in the theoretical computer guided traffic crossings. Such places would have to have a pedestrian bridge nearby, as they aren't compatible with the slow human form.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So trains. You're describing light rail.

[–] stevles@aussie.zone 9 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

The average yank: “A what?!”

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 6 points 26 minutes ago

It means "just a little cocaine".

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 19 points 57 minutes ago

The most obvious solution to "idling combustion engine is polluting" is get rid of the combustion engine to the extent possible.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 43 minutes ago

Ped bridges take up a large area and are expensive. Also what if youre in a wheel chair?

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 1 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

round about with a walk over bridge.

done annnnd done.

[–] brambc@lemmy.world 8 points 50 minutes ago (2 children)

Ah yes, let’s force the non-motorised to climb stairs or make a minutes long detour!

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 43 minutes ago

I heard an electromagnetic catapult is about to become available, maybe there's another way to solve this. Gotta keep refreshing that GSA auction site.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 3 points 20 minutes ago

ok so we could use pneumatic tubes to go places...

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 hour ago

Underground round about with a park on top.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world -2 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

What if youre in a wheel chair?

[–] AWTM_James@sh.itjust.works 3 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

Dang, too bad no one's ever thought of that... Oh wait

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

Dang look at the size of them, its almost like you can't put them at every cross walk...

Oh and the cost isn't prohibitive, who would have thunk?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

Why would every intersection need one?

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 18 minutes ago (2 children)

I always assumed the button is just for mashing to soothe angry monkeys, it doesn't actually change the light, does it? That's madness.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 3 minutes ago

It certainly doesn't cause the lights for the cars to change at the intersection at the corner of my apartment. It rarely ever even gives the pedestrian the little dude on the screen instead of the big orange hand.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Might tell the electronics that there's a person waiting so it'll do the audible chirps or pre-recorded verbal messages when the lights change. Haven't paid enough attention to notice whether they still happen with no button-press.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 4 points 41 minutes ago (2 children)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 6 points 24 minutes ago

I think this guy is maybe just a for real asshole.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 30 minutes ago

I might be fixing up a big bowl of Poe Slaw here but if OOP is who he claims to be, it's plausible. Seems like the kind of jackass who would mean it. Yet another waste of initials that could've meant they were just kidding.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 4 minutes ago

Utilitarianism is a tricky philosophy, it's got a lot of sharp edges like this.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 53 minutes ago

This guy is going to shoot a pedestrian for pushing crosswalk signal buttons and claim he's stopping a serial killer.

[–] golinux@fedia.io 1 points 17 minutes ago (1 children)

"Jeremy Kauffman is an American entrepreneur and political activist known for founding and leading the blockchain-based filesharing project LBRY. He is also a vocal supporter and activist within the Free State Project (FSP), a movement designed to get libertarians to move to New Hampshire. Kauffman was the Libertarian nominee in the 2022 United States Senate election in New Hampshire, losing to Democrat Maggie Hassan. He was elected the chair of the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire in 2026. Kauffman has been known for his provocative statements on Twitter that have been deemed violent, racist, and antisemitic. His legal troubles include misdemeanor charges of disorderly conduct and obstruction of government administration stemming from an incident where he allegedly tried to fight several people while hurling racist insults."

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Full explanation only 6 words in.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

This HAS to be satire

I'd say it's about 50/50. Which would make it very good satire if it was. But I don't want to influence Schroedinger's satire by peeking.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 1 points 25 minutes ago

No, this guy has actual shitbag vibes: I think it's real.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 53 minutes ago (2 children)

What makes me mad is when people press the button and then jaywalk immediately anyway. If you press it, you should have to wait just like the drivers will.

[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 6 points 39 minutes ago

What makes me mad is pressing the button and then having to wait an additional 5+ minutes for the ped signal to change because it needs to finish the current green phase for cross traffic and an advance left turn phase before letting peds go.

[–] Jaycifer@piefed.social 1 points 36 minutes ago

I’m not a civil engineer, but based on my experience with traffic lights pushing the button doesn’t actually alter the order of operations for the lights, it just makes it so the next time there is a natural gap in traffic that would allow for safe crossing, the crosswalk light turns on. So it doesn’t affect drivers at all. I’m still not a fan of jaywalking unless the road is REALLY clear.

That said, I’m always Jay walking when I go somewhere :P

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

No, nothing is worse than reclining your airplane seat.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Judging by the pic, it's maybe 6-7 cars so 2-3 minutes of human life destroyed. A little uneven but not terrible.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 2 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

If that road had 100 cars passing every 30 seconds, there's no able, adult male going to Frogger himself across six lanes.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 0 points 42 minutes ago

Nor a mom pushing a stroller, a person w/ a cane, etc