this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
105 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30941 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Is there any way to disrupt or damage these gloves when they're used?

[–] Lennny@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Chaff grenades with conductive metals. Let them burn themselves.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 6 points 4 hours ago

Water can do the job. Maybe the gloves won't stop working... but the one wearing them will.

[–] sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Not really. They're water resistant. Like, they say not to dunk it in water, but also that it won't shock the wearer if it gets wet.

Defensive measures are possible: It won't work through thick clothing as well.

Might be interesting to see what happens if they grab someone wearing conductive fabric. Give it a path of least resistance that doesn't include the person being groped.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't this like a stun gun, but worse because you have to get into physical contact?

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 minutes ago

The goal of stun guns is to lock the victims muscles up so they can't move. These gloves don't appear to do that and according to the manual someone else can be holding the victim while they are being used. The primary purpose of these gloves seems to be to cause pain. From their manual:

CD3s function by over-stimulating the sense of touch within the Peripheral Nervous System which causes Neuro Peripheral Interference or NPI. CD3 technology delivers a pain stimulus strictly to the area of the epidermis contacted by the CD3

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Just think hit many orioles healthcare that could cover instead. Or if that were put towards solving affordability issues. It’s almost like this administration has wildly different priorities.

[–] Amuro_eat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

So the gloves are made by company owned by a donor for the child rapist crew

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We're in the world now where I'd be more surprised if they weren't.

[–] Amuro_eat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, I guess at least it’s all really predictable these days. The mundaneness of evil.

[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 1 points 10 hours ago

I mean, duh. It’s important information, but did anyway not just know this would be the case?

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck it. Bring out the guns.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No need for guns. Just a bucket of water.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 55 minutes ago

Elsewhere someone mentioned they're made not to shock the wearer if wet but don't immerse in water.

I was thinking maybe conductive netting. They'd have to pull it off of themselves...