this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
58 points (80.9% liked)

196

6761 readers
2240 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hasan piker (guy on the right) is actively making abdul el-sayed’s chances at election worse and i am frustrated about it given the stakes so i made this meme.

because like. my absolute BESTIE abdul el-sayed is out here working miracles at home trying to keep poc, migrant, low-income, queer, etc. people alive and doing the actual work of building a coalition, including making real inroads with his Jewish constituency, while being explicitly pro-Palestinian and rejecting AIPAC money.

hasan piker has made a handful of appearances with both abdul and zohran, but now abdul is getting viciously smeared for hasan’s own words, with fox news literally turning things hasan said into attack-ad material against him. and hasan just will not read the room and step back.

this is the same BOZO hasan piker who wears mao outfits, plays literal terrorist propaganda videos for his friends and goes “they’re just very musical people,” denies the Uyghur genocide, supports the invasion of Tibet, lies about queer rights in China while going on tours, and has said enough insane shit that even my OTHER bestie zohran mamdani disavowed him months ago. and the room is STILL unread and some people are trying to tell me i have to fall on the sword for piker.

do i have to beg ;;;;;;

i just want candidates who aren’t evil to win :’(

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 3 points 59 minutes ago

I didn't know who that guy is, so I watched a couple of videos. Best I can tell is that he's just another political streamer. He has some rather simplistic views on the USSR and China but most people do. I think he's basically just another social media personality trying to pass themselves off as an intellectual. The right has loads of them and seem to be doing fine, so I wouldn't loose too much sleep over it.

hasan is awesome; they're not attacking abdul because of hasan, they're attacking him because they're fucking racist assholes who love aipac money.

and abdul is still winning <3

[–] dreamy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

What are you going on about with "playing terrorist propaganda" and "denying the Uyghur genocide"? And why are you calling politicians 'buddies'?

[–] NewDark@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago

this is the same BOZO hasan piker who wears mao outfits, plays literal terrorist propaganda videos for his friends and goes “they’re just very musical people,” denies the Uyghur genocide, supports the invasion of Tibet, lies about queer rights in China while going on tours

Alright it's pretty clear what community you're coming from, or you're a really gullible liberal. Why do you seem to care more about this streamer than these political campaigns? Mighty strange behavior.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 25 points 5 hours ago

fox news literally turning things hasan said into attack-ad material against [El-Sayed]

I don't really think that's gonna do much? Fox was gonna run attack ads regardless of Hasan's proximity, and the core audience of Fox News... is the core audience of Fox News.

[–] Cherries@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There is nothing Abdul El-Sayed could do to make Establishment Democrats or the Republicans party stop attacking him. All the things you like El-Sayed for are the exact reasons he is being smeared by Fox News and CNN. Disavowing a streamer will not help because the DNC and RNC do not actually care about Hasan Piker; they are just using him as a tool to attack progressive ideas. There will always, always be something else to attack Abdul over.

Jesse Watters has said and done way more horrible things than Hasan Piker, yet it would be absurd to claim that Abdul El-Sayed should apologize for going on Fox News and should disavow Jesse Watters. That Abdul is going to lose his left wing voters for guilt-by-association with Watters.

I cannot speak for what other people have told you, but I do not think you need to fall on the sword for Hasan Piker. You do need to stop falling for conservative propaganda though. The GOP's official plan is to try and use Hasan Piker as a distraction away from the actual harm they are inflicting upon US citizens. Fox News talked about Hasan Piker over 300 times since April not because they think Piker and Adbul are close friends, but to try and manufacture outrage against a twitch streamer while gas and eggs are absurdly expensive. You are angry at Hasan for the idea that Hasan and Abdul are closely tied together. Fox News is the one tying the knots. CNN and MSNBC are providing the string.

Any time spent upset about Hasan Piker is a distraction from the actual harmful people in this country who have access to the levers of power.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe -2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

You are angry at Hasan for the idea that Hasan and Abdul are closely tied together. Fox News is the one tying the knots. CNN and MSNBC are providing the string.

doesn’t that kinda mean by posting this I am untying that string? i kinda fuck with that TBH.

📣 hasan is NOT the face of the left yall! 🗣️🗣️i have no defense of him and the actual harmful people in this country are exploiting him for power. 😬😬😬😬

and abdul for senate. shoutout my boy abdul.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 points 1 hour ago

Abdul is great. A fascist dipshit tried to attack him on his support for trans rights and doctors' expertise by spouting some nonsense about cutting kids' dicks off. Abdul replied with "are you circumcised" and dismantled the ad hominem in three words.

[–] Cherries@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

I am trying to explain that you are wasting your time trying to untie the two. Hasan Piker is not a significant weight holding down Abdul El-Sayed. The Establishment Democrats and the entire Republican Party are where you should focus your ire. The Republicans because they are doing evil shit and the Establishment Democrats because they are focusing on attacking Abdul El-Sayed using Hasan Piker instead of fighting the evil shit.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Idk why people feel the need to defend hasan on this platform so much. he is directly depositing money into Amazon's pocket by streaming on twitch. I feel like thats pretty antithetical to using platforms like lemmy. he has the budget to self host something like Peertube.

this in addition to everything you said OP.

[–] KernelTale@programming.dev 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody goes on peertube. I have no idea about his policies but leaving mainstream sites would be a political suicide.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So why is Trump using Mastodon…?

[–] KernelTale@programming.dev 1 points 57 minutes ago

Because he got banned from Twitter before Musk has bought it. The original comment condemns Hasan for using Twitch, which I am assuming was intended as bad for using at all. Your example is somebody who uses multiple platforms, which hasn't cut off the part of his base that refuses to follow him to Truthsocial. It also has an advantage of moving his most loyal cultists to a different platform, where he can feed them propaganda without having to worry as much about scaring off potential moderate republicans. Oh and the chicken and an egg problem. Trump solved it by buying chickens and other power given to him by an insane amount of capital.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au 1 points 2 hours ago

Reposting on here in the minute chance mastodon takes off when twitter fails? Or just gets popular for some unknown reason. All they do is copy paste his whitehouse, and truth media shit everywhere.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

yeah and he also spends literally all day scrolling elon musk’s nazi twitter. he really knows how to pick an aesthetic lol.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

If Hasan genuinely gave a shit about making the country a better place, he wouldn't be trying to self enrich off of El-Sayed. He'd have continued to support him as a fan and advocate, but not try to insert himself as a key figure to his campaign.

I also don't agree with the take A LOT of leftist have that El-Sayed is "running away from Hasan to save face" or "he's betraying Hasan by refusing to defend him".

El-Sayed's campaign and political career is about a million more important things than Hasan. Its about saving our country's Democracy. Its about universal healthcare. Its about ending the grip of Israel over the US and their genocides. Its about justice against the fascists.

If El-Sayed spent his time trying to defend Hasan from every bad-faith attack on Hasan, El-Sayed's campaign would cease to be about any of the WAY MORE IMPORTANT things he's fighting for, and it'd become all about Hasan. It'd be playing into The MAGA and Zionist Liberal playbook and pigeonhole his campaign with Hasan. Its what his opponents want.

[–] Zgierwoj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I kept hearing about that betrayal thing and its some minor election on the other side of the globe, so pardon me for not knowing or caring about the details, but what is Hasan's political project for if he's not gonna help people like El Sayed get elected? (He loves aesthetics of revolution, but I'll eat a shoe if he actually helps make one happen) There is nothing that stops him from supporting figures that publically disavow him apart from ego, is there? What even is the point of him being a part of the campaign?

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

what is Hasan’s political project for

To make a name for himself so some portion of the internet tunes into his streams and thus give him that sweet advertising money.

What even is the point of him being a part of the campaign?

Free publicity.

[–] Zgierwoj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

I mean, of course it is about his self interest too, that isn't inherently something wrong, I just hope he would rethink his priorities

[–] Smif_N_Lenin@piefed.social 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Abdul was the one who reached out to Hasan and asked him to stump for him. None of these right-wing attack ads have any motion anyway, and doesn't change Abdul's messaging discipline, as these ruthlessly islamphobic attacks would happen either way

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 0 points 6 hours ago

so much more eloquently put than i could do yet i agree with every word thank you so much 🫡🫡🔥

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

see this is what’s so scary to me is i can literally say “i am a progressive leftist and i want progressive leftists and social democrats to win”

and i’ll still get accused of being “right wing” (what i assume you mean by “rw”, correct me if im wrong) for not… diving on the sword for the imperialism-condoning “I call it Crimea river, a Russian river bitch” guy?

i just want human rights and healthcare sadge

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I thought Abdul was a democratic socialist, not a social democrat?

[–] dreamy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

He literally pulled out some kind of right-libertarian dogwhistle during live interview 😂

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean you've accepted a wholly right wing frame built to literally target hogs. How do you expect people to react to your regurgitation of right wing talking points.

can literally say “i am a progressive leftist and i want progressive leftists and social democrats to win”

Yeah it doesn't matter what you say, it matters what you do. People say one thing and do another all the time, and you are doing that right here.

You aren't doing what you say. You are doing this other thing, literally just accepting the slop that fascist media is shoving down the slop tubes like any other hog. Fox news and right wing corporate media have spent billions to get you, yes you to repeat their lines for them. And you ate it up like a lil' piggy. You doing the fascists work for them.

So if you want people to evaluate you differently, do different things.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

okay thanks for sharing your thoughts, your exceeding rhetorical politeness is seen and appreciated