this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
438 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31071 readers
2609 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump pledged Wednesday to send every American adult $5,000 if Republicans retain control of the House and Senate in the midterm elections, an extraordinary gambit to reverse his party’s sagging fortunes in November.

The dubious promise would likely cost more than $1 trillion and require congressional approval, and would further exacerbate the country’s nearly $1.8 trillion annual budget deficit and concerns about inflation.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not that anybody but billionaires will ever get paid

Each week the government said less about the findings of the board of inquiry which was to decide how the $5000 per person could be wangled. It became easier to answer malcontents with a cuff from a Minute Man than by repetitious statements from Washington.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago

Haven't read that in over 20 years, but poking around and found this just a couple paragraphs after your quote and it is also very fitting...

Everybody delightfully profited, except the very poor, the common workmen, the skilled workmen, the small business men, the professional men, and old couples living on annuities or their savings.

Poking around the text was chilling.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 76 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nevermind the financial cost. He's literally offering to bribe the public in broad daylight, an impeachable offense under article 2 section 4 of the US constitution:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

There's no interpretation of this section that can make Trump soliciting votes by way of bribery not an impeachable offense... But he'll get away with it again because his cronies in Congress will refuse to impeach him.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd love for that to happen, but realistically, any blanket term the public should want that you campaign with could be construed as bribery.

"Vote for our party and if we win, we're going to get universal healthcare and medicine and do away with medical insurance filth"

See. Now the public is being bribed with a functioning government that works for its citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm all for it honestly, after $40 trillion in debt the least they can do is start giving everyone else some of it before the whole thing collapses

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

In other words, Trump feels the only way that Americans will vote for candidates who support his unpopular agenda is to bribe them.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Well he has a great reputation for paying people.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Democratic leadership should call his bluff and pledge to work across the aisle to pay everyone $5000 even if they take control of the House and Senate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Now do it every other month and call it UBI. Oh no we can’t have that? That would be communism?

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 110 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If you think you're going to receive $5,000 if Republicans win the 2026 election, then you don't realize who made you need the extra $5,000 in the first place.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 23 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Exactly. Idk about you, but Trump has undoubtedly cost me way more than $5k with just his 2 years back in office. And that's before considering the catastrophic long-term effects he's had on costs.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Just like he promised no new wars.

[–] SecretiveVault@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

I'll pass on the $5k just to watch that idiot lose

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Where the hell is my $2000 DOGE check? I'm starting to thing this guy is full of shit and not just in his diaper

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump’s proposal would be legal because the payment would go to everyone regardless of how they voted, or whether they voted at all, said New Mexico-based attorney John Day.

“This is a campaign promise,” Day said. “It’s not a payment to individuals to try to get them to vote in a particular way.”

Just going to ignore the "if Republicans retain control of the House and the Senate", huh, AP?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 53 points 1 day ago

Man I'm going to take this money and combine it with:

My DOGE dividend that divididnt.

My Tariff rebate check that is non existent.

Same song, same dance, same rubes.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yep. And you know what they say about bribery:

Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The guy who never pays people what he owes them says once again that we’ll get a vague mystery check sometime soon? I’m going to go ahead and hold my breath for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Sure, his promises ar reliable.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He won’t do it.

But good grief think how fucked we are that $5K is an amount that makes people salivate.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

how pathetic that half the median global annual income makes salivate.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Okay but that’s not how economics works.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

your inexperience with poverty and living in other countries is not their inexperience with poverty and living in other countries

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Does not change the fact that that isn’t how economics WORKS.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So Lech Wałęsa, during first democratic elections in Poland after the fall of communism in 1990, promised that if he wins every citizen will get 100.000.000PLN ($2.5k, lots of money in Poland in 1990). People laughed, there were songs about it but he did win the elections. Of course no one got 100M PLN.

Years later I saw some documentary about rural regions in Poland and they were talking with some farmer from a tiny village. He looked and talked like he could barely read...

Farmer: Wałęsa was not my President.

Reporter: So you didn't vote for him?

Farmer: I did because he promised me 100M PLN...

So yes, people can be that stupid. MAGA definitively is stupid enough to buy it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

I can imagine all kinds of idiots falling for this, even if legally questionable and he's about as likely to come through as he did for his promises on child care in 2016....

I have someone in my family that said they were voting for him in 2016 because of his child care promise. I often think of that when I reflect on him and Pence and other idiots in his camp all repeating that slogan and getting their republizombies to parrot it: "promises made, promises kept".

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Antifa hasn't paid me a cent, yet. I'm not trusting this guy.

Also, for a bribe to work, you need to pay first.

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago

And half the country will believe him. Because they’re that fucking stupid…still.

[–] deifyed@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 day ago

This generates more incentive for the politicians to keep the people poor. The poorer the people are, the cheaper winning a vote is since less money will be enough motivation to sway them

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›