this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
1020 points (99.6% liked)

196

6824 readers
2522 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

David Simon, creator of 'The Wire', being interviewed by Ari Shapiro (NPR)

SHAPIRO: Ok, so you've spent your career television without AI, and I could imagine today you thinking, boy, I wish I had that tool to solve those thorny problems...

SIMON: What?

SHAPIRO: ... Or saying...

SIMON: You imagine that?

SHAPIRO: ... Boy, if that had existed, it would have screwed me over.

SIMON: I don't think AI can challenge what writers do at a fundamentally creative level.

SHAPIRO: But if you're trying to transition from scene five to scene six, and you're stuck with that transition, you could imagine plugging that portion of the script into an AI and say, give me 10 ideas for how to transition this.

SIMON: I'd rather put a gun in my mouth.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 hours ago

I never get the "generate ideas with AI" advice. AI can be useful for directing you to sources for researching an idea or poking holes in your ideas, but the ideas AI comes up themselves are so braindead and bland. If you're stuck in such a fundamental way you need to go back and rewrite sections and rethink what you're trying to do.

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

NPRs corporate capture is a national disgrace. The reporters are fucking hand puppets now a days.

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 2 points 48 minutes ago

Cut their funding massively and that's what you get I guess. PBS also got massive cuts under Trump, information is the enemy of the state.

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 62 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Writing is so much easier when you skip over the bit where you do writing.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 13 points 8 hours ago

most fun part of writing is the part where you don't write

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

Thank you! OP should be shot

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 90 points 15 hours ago (9 children)

I've had this exact conversation in real life.

I do IT work. Someone who was a heavy AI user asked me 'how was I integrating AI into my workflow' as if it was a foregone conclusion that I AM integrating AI. I told him I wasn't, that AI may be useful for finding answers to some things or photoshopping funny pictures but most of what I do is intellectual, specific to certain situations and requirements, which AI generally doesn't understand. That I can't risk AI making actual changes to my environments, so if I let AI write a plan and then I proof it myself and then do it, it's easier just to do the work myself. So that leaves the only thing AI could do for me is writing, and I'm good at writing, so I overall have little or no use for AI.

Dude looked at me like I was an alien. Like he legitimately could not understand why an intelligent person would voluntarily reject AI. Like I said I rejected cars and I ride a horse to work. Does not compute. Here's this supposedly smart person who knows more about tech than the next 2-3 people in the office combined, and this person is completely rejecting the holy grail.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I think everyone should think of AI as that you have random access to the knowledge of reddit. Sometimes it's good, sometimes it's a troll, and sometimes no one will answer. You also have to have knowledge to understand what it's saying most of the time.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But, you have to specify it isn't actually redditors seeing the question and posting an answer. AI doesn't actually understand questions.

It's more that it sees your question and generates text near that question that wouldn't look out of place on Reddit. Sometimes what it generates is good, sometimes it's what a troll would say, the key thing is that it's believable but not accurate.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

the key thing is that it’s believable but not accurate.

Right, I think we're agreeing. That is exactly like reddit.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

at least reddit doesn't (well, didn't) consume a nonillion jiggawatts just to produce a half-shitty answer

[–] upandatom@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Devils advocate only:

But you'd have to include the electric consumption of all reddit commenters and posters as well since they are creating the content.

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It’s tough not to form a superiority complex these days when you hear of people who can’t compose emails by themselves.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 16 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, and I think it's a symptom of a cultural problem where people think prosperity means essentially not having to do anything. The ideal is to sit on your ass and consume, while never having to create.

But when you don't do anything for yourself and have AI or hired help do it so that you can go back to scrolling the dopamine treadmill, you eventually don't know how to do it even if you wanted to. Losing knowledge, skills, and attention span means getting more stupid, kinda by definition.

This negative feedback loop is a form of conditioning, and it is not in our best interests. It is in the interests of advertisers, psychological manipulators, tech barons, and others who are generally the worst.

In my case, the more I have consciously decided to take care of my own shit -- in various aspects of life -- the better I have felt. It's not the one secret to a fulfilling life, but it's an important one. And yes damn it, I sometimes use dashes.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

My boss had three of us on a Teams call for nearly an hour and a half yesterday because he needed our help to make one Power Point slide.

[–] korazail@eviltoast.org 11 points 8 hours ago

To be fair, power point - if you don't regularly use it and especially if you're using a 'template' someone made - is a miserable experience.

Add four words to a sentence - why did the fucking font size change and why did an unrelated text box shrink?!?!? I just need to add 'this has been approved' to my status deck.

Why can't I update a blob of text? Oh, it's in the Slide Master, which has exactly one instance of this slide type in the deck.

/rant. I haven't lowered myself to using copilot to make these changes, though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Doug@piefed.social 50 points 17 hours ago (9 children)

Sometimes I can just feel the neolib oozing from an NPR host and their faith in capitalism to fix all things.

For me it really started when Freakenomics lobbed those softball questions to one of the Koch brothers, and then I had a moment of “…what the fuck are you doing? …have you always been like this? …and I’m just now noticing? …oh god …oh god! your previous episodes are so terrible too! how did I not see this?! it’s all bathwater! no baby! oh fuck!”

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 hours ago

I can't quite put my finger on moments like yours, but had the same strange sensation of creeping revulsion toward NPR, where it once felt like a safe, familiar, even comforting, thing.

NPR, in a million ways small and large, carries water for the status quo, and it's fuckin gross. Even just small ongoing things like their current phrasing "the war in Iran". It's an anodyne, neutral phrasing used in their broadcasts, seemingly as a rule. Same neutral language for cops when "an assailant was shot and died", or when "a weapon discharged", etc.

It's never the war against Iran, it's not "the unprovoked attack against Iran", etc., it's just this vague inscrutable thing merely happening, and merely in Iran. No one is responsible, and it just is there. And thankfully, it's only IN Iran! Wouldn't it be worse if that were spilling over into other places and things?

There are countless stronger examples, but this one is current and consistent and you can hear it in any random news broadcast, and it tells a huge lie in a tiny word every time.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›