Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
One of my daughters has CP and we use the term ironically often… is retard really becoming a slur? We think it’s fine if you’re not special needs around these parts. However if you called a special needs person retarded then its basically fighting words.
Dear FBI, Kash Patel is a douchebag. Please make sure he sees this.
Hugs and kisses.
For the record the Twitter page that article is talking about ('I Find Retards') is a right-wing Twitter page. Previously considered retards: trans people and those with Down Syndrome, and anyone remotely left-wing. They use 'retard' because they don't care about minorities and like 'edgy humor'. Why do you use it, then? Don't make your hatred of fascists make you forget about your fellow disabled Dems, like me.
We've made a bit of progress. In the past, such a post would be immediately banned, simply for having the word in the title. As if the word itself is magical apart from context and intent.
"Free speech absolutists" except when their feelings get hurt...
The mods.... Literally half the comments here got censored and banned
Because they were using the r-slur? That only makes sense. It's against the community rules, is it not? The mods here never claimed to be free speech absolutists.
If you think the problem here is that people aren't allowed to use the r-slur, you completely missed the point of the article.
The hypocrisy is the main issue. This admin cries about how people can't say the r-slur anymore, and then they get butthurt and threaten abuses of power when it's used against them.
Weaponizing the FBI against some jerks on the internet is a huge part of the problem too. Enforcing conduct and language standards falls on content moderation teams, not federal law enforcement. That doesn't mean the whole internet should be the wild west. Unless you're okay with nazis spouting hate? Because that's what you'll get with free speech absolutism.
So honestly I really don't get you're point. Should the mods not remove comments that use slurs, and ban repeat offenders?
This headline will very likely be written in history books.