^My revenge porn fantasy, daily.
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
594 points (99.0% liked)
196
6852 readers
2402 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I get what you mean but I think you might want to know revenge p is also when people share pics unconsensually to get revenge or hurt others for some other reason 😅
That is good to know. Thanks for having my back.
It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s… Disproportionate Response Man!
Completely proportionate. Many people die from the laziness of people who refuse to flick a switch.
Study link?
It's Eagle Man.
Pretty sure that's just Justice Lord Superman.
The hero we need but don’t deserve
I don't think he's gonna be using turn signals any time soon.
Also not gonna be intentionally not using them.
Me_irl 🥹
You can drive however, just fucking tell me what you're doing so I can navigate safely around you 🥹
How many people have you ripped in half to date?
Ive tried for at least 30, sadly I'm weak and feeble so they're mostly just really bewildered by my attempts and leave freaked out by my strange behavior
Thank you for your service
Whatever it takes to keep my country safe 🪖🫡🎖️ /j
I appreciate the dedication to it though. Keep going and you’ll eventually be able to do it!
Beamers beware!
Going too easy on him.
Idea: cars all have too much AI in them anyway, let's make good use of it. If a car detects that the driver turns or changes lanes without signaling 5 times in a row, it caps the speed to 50 km/h (or 30 in an urban area) for 5 minutes. Make this a mandatory safety feature in all new cars, like how they make noises if you don't wear a seatbelt.
I'm all for punishing bad drivers, but absolutely no need for AI there.
How do you detect these occurrences then? You can't differentiate a lane change from a curving road without analyzing the environment.
You think we need AI for a car to do that?
I mean you do if you want investors pumped up while you plan your golden parachute exit
Back when I had a car, it had lane-keeping assistance. It followed road lines and edges automatically, which meant it also resisted turning into any lines and edges it detected if you didn't have your signal on. Could probably keep a counter for lane changes and turns at marked intersections.
Yeah, that's AI in my book. It's almost certainly the output of machine learning using lots of sensor data, trained on mountains of older data. How is that not AI?
From what I understand, the output from programs using a machine learning algorithm continuously change as more inputs change the variable weightings of whatever model they have.
But the lane and road edge detection thresholds for my car's sensors were likely determined (i.e, they picked and set fixed averages) from lots of data and set them as static values in the program to compare against. That's just using data and statistics as usual.
There are toy cars for students of programming to write simple self-driving algorithms from sensor data to drive without colliding into walls and black or colored tape. Same idea. But I wouldn't call it "AI," which is a marketing term to begin with, not a scientific one.
Anyway, certainly no ML algorithm was running on the car's system. The driving assist was very simple and predictable, and it was manufactured in 2018.
machine learning is not ai
It literally is.
its just algorithms, there is no "intelligence". same with chatgpt, gemeni, claude, etc. they're all just algorithms fed loads of data to spit out
For as much as i know, it was always called AI
yup, but that's what "AI" means
is this ragebait
I was wondering the same thing...
I mean doesn't AI just mean something that mimics humans/human inteligence or somethinf like that in some way or something like that?
the amount of turning in the wheel and the time of turning. You can also use speed.
The fact that modern cars are backseat drivers but not competent drivers is why I don't own a car anymore. Don't get me wrong, I used signals, but it's a million little nitpicks that add up. They're features for other people, not the user, that I'm only buying because I have no real choice. Heaven forbid any actual legal enforcement of those rules by people - it must be done by making products more annoying.
Cars (and humans) can either drive for me or STFU about my driving.
I know exactly what you mean. All the little alerts that remind me to keep my eyes on the road or whatever are actually more distracting than just letting me look at the road. All of these things are designed for people who suck at driving so much that they shouldn't be allowed to drive a car, anyway.
In fairness, any time I drive near construction my car starts screaming about how I'm drifting out of my lane because it doesn't recognize cone supremacy - so if cars did this I know my car would constantly be like "I can't let you do that."
I use my signals, I'll pass the government mandated test. Yes, even in turn lanes, I'll ace it. (Also, you should turn in to whatever lane you're in, not "whichever one I want.")
Lets not make it unsafe for other people.
Just add a really loud horn every time they forget their turn signal.
Unironically, this is the best solution. Make it more annoying to not use the signal than to use it. Shake the wheel, sound an alarm, nudge back into the lane. Make using turn signals the selfish option. Lots of cars already do this to some small extent.
Ah yes, make things even more dangerous by forcing people to drive too slow on the highway.
I think the immediate aftermath of an unsignaled lane change is the worst time for the car to automatically cutting from presumably highway speeds of like 65-70 mph (105-113 kph) [assuming they weren’t speeding…] down to 31 mph (50 kph) if there are people driving in the new lane. Not only did someone pull out in front of you but you also have to immediately slam on the brakes to have a chance of not hitting it
I never said it was a good idea!
Thanks for the laugh
Let the punishment fit the crime.
You'd probably like the movie Shoot 'Em Up.
Lmao holy crap
No turn signal MFers.
This and pulling into an intersection you don't have a snowball's chance in hell of clearing before the light changes (Bonus points for the vehicle being an 18 wheeler and having hazardous cargo).