this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
301 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

12582 readers
2497 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 29 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The minimum wage was supposed to be enough for one person to take care of a family of four and keep them out of poverty.

Now, the minimum wage is inadequate to support a person, let alone a pet or family.

Henry Ford, the CEO of Ford Motor Co. made 50x more than his baseline employee.

Now, a starting employee for Ford makes about $18.00 an hour, $38,000 a year. Not enough to support any family (but more than minimum wage by far)

The CEO of Ford made $27,000,000 a year, or about $37,000.00 an hour. That's over 700x more than a baseline employee.

(all approx. from duck duck go search)

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 hour ago

I met Americans telling me that these poor corporations can't survive if they have to pay a minimum salary and how it was meant for teenagers ... it was weird. I was like, you live in SF ... what's the minimum again? how much is rent again?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 28 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That make you go "Hmm..." until you think about them for a few seconds. The fact FDR implemented progressive social policies isn't why the 22nd Amendment was ratified. Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, and Jackson established a convention of a maximum two terms by declining to run for a third.

Just like a lot of laws, the 22nd Amendment was written when someone finally violated a long-observed norm. Four terms in a row (without a definite end, even, as Roosevelt died early in his fourth term) was wildly outside the norm and forced politicians to confront formal term limits instead of unspoken, honors system ones.

The only states that voted to reject the 22nd were Oklahoma and Massachusetts.

Congress was more partisan, mainly being Republicans and southern Democrats voting in favor. This was pre-Southern Strategy, and the GOP was more complicated. With Truman (FDR's former VP) on the backfoot when Congress was deciding on the 22nd, it's pretty obvious why there'd be a partisan split—with the amendment existing because of FDR, whose popularity the Democratic Party were still riding off of.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 4 minutes ago

Just like a lot of laws, the 22nd Amendment was written when someone finally violated a long-observed norm.

We're going to need a lot more of those after the current administration.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 hour ago

FDR was absolutely not a democratic socialist. He was a social democrat. He favored concessions to the working class to prevent them from revolting and overthrowing capitalism. The US was way behind Europe because the USSR showed workers everywhere what was possible and the US purged them all and sent them back to Europe, and the European bourgeoisie had to make concessions to the working class to prevent them from revolting and overthrowing capitalism. The US thought it had defended against this possibility with purges, but then the business cycle showed up and crashed the US economy, taking down the rest of the world with it. And they thought they could ride it out and let the working class suffer. But there was a real risk of class consciousness emerging and this FDR presided over concessions to keep the people pacified

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 53 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

What's really funny is that if you ask a MAGA about FDR they'll swear that FDR's policies kept the Depression going longer and it was only the massive government spending for WW2 that got the economy going again.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Not even MAGAts, my great grandmother allegedly hated FDR so much she refused to utter his name or refer to him as the President.

[–] UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world 60 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Because that’s a Heritage foundation talking point. They think they’re lions and wolves, but really they’re parrots.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 hours ago

Well that's just because they're delusional idiots 🤷🏻

[–] raspberry_confetti@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago

I am literally begging Republicans to set the precedent that you can run as many terms as you want

[–] sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 hours ago

People also seem to forget that FDR was a compromise position and that even he tried a few times to sell people out.