this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
260 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

12339 readers
1955 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 31 minutes ago

My personal favorite was in Batman and Robin where they cut open the city's water main and the water just keeps flowing along in a cylindrical shape... Come ON

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 2 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

I had this with Interstellar. The story is that most plants died and they can't grow food but corn. So they're at a baseball game and this older character says "Popcorn?! I'm sick of corn, I want a hotdog". He knows there aren't hotdogs anymore, he's just frustrated at the situation. Nobody responds.

That's the moment everyone should have jumped up to shut up grandpa. You can't say that! Billions died, you insensitive asshat. Be glad you have food. Eating meat would be socially unacceptable because you can't feed society that way anymore. It would be on the level of grandpa saying old-timey racist shit out loud in public

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 32 minutes ago

My wife loves hocus pocus.

Every year I'm like... That zippo wouldn't light. The fluid would have evaporated ages ago. Look at the cobwebs, it's obviously been there for years.

She just reaches over, softly touches my and says 7u5k3n, it's a movie.

Lol

So yeah there's nothing wrong here.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I’m like this if a movie’s plot can only happen because of bad communication.

[–] WiredBrain@lemmy.ca 2 points 37 minutes ago

I was able to tolerate more of this in movies than I used to after acknowledging that tons of people in real life suck at communication.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

My wife can't help pointing out when travel isn't realistic enough, like when a series of city landmarks show up in the wrong order.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 8 points 1 hour ago

Quite right too. In this life, a man must have standards.

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 1 points 32 minutes ago

Am I their dad? Do I have kids now?

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago

Bet he loved how Dexter had 40 hours in a day

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I won’t stop watching, but it drives me nuts when lawyers in a show misuse “begs the question”

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I think there are probably about three people who use the expression "begs the question" as it's defined in books. Through misuse it has evolved to mean, "brings up the question," just as "based off" has come to mean the same as "based on".

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

lawyers would know the difference

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 33 minutes ago

We got three of those people right here in this thread baby.

Aristotle in the house

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Dude I'm all for suspending disbelief but I feel this so hard. Like, sure, there's werewolves and you have silver bullets which in this universe don't melt and tumble, but that's a Beretta 92FS, you have 15+1 silver shots before a reload, not infinite, and you can't use your infinite Berettas to cut a hole in the floor.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

They bought their guns from the same dealer who gave Lara Croft her handguns in the original games.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Not exactly the same, but the only time I've seen Cloverfield, my dad was watching it. He fast-forwarded through everything that wasn't giant monsters. The movie was about 40 minutes long, and I think it's my preferred cut.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

How good was the battery in that camcorder as well?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 hours ago

I'd be down to try this, but I'm not skipping any scenes with my beloved Lizzy Caplan either. Been had a crush since Mean Girls came out.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 52 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

I count bullets. If someone with a revolver fires off 20 rounds in a row without a pause, the show/movie lost credibility and I'm taken out of it. Extra bad if they later try to use ammo as a plot device to raise drama, ugh.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

I hate when an actor clearly doesn't even understand how to hold and aim a gun and their character is supposed to be competent at it.

Cate Blanchet's character in Borderlands is a recent and particularly obvious example. In the movie's trailer she is shown holding and aiming a rifle like someone who clearly never held a gun before and my understanding is that her character was supposed to be a highly competent gunslinger.

Someone coach those actors for crying out loud.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 51 minutes ago

I think the problem is that Cate Blanchett has too big an ego to be taught/learn anything, including how to act. But that's just my humble opinion.

I don't know enough to notice bad gunplay but anachronistic makeup/hair styling can bother me. Costumes I give some slack because it could be a budget issue.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Or when people in a gunfight clearly aren't hearing the apocalyptically loud sound gunshots would make in their situation - like in a small room or in a car.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Take your finger off the trigger!

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The butt of the stock goes against your shoulder, not in your armpit!

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's just bad prop decisions. There are guns that better fit. In a cheap movie, I can forgive it. A budget over 200k? I'm upset

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

I don't know enough about the division of duties to know whose fault it is, but I blame the director. It's just lazy, and easy.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago

Underworld was always the one that annoyed me with their guns. Main character fires this automatic handgun for minutes and doesn't reload.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What if there's a cut where they could have conceivably reloaded?

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

I'm OK with it, if you show me at least one reload before you run out of bullets at the most dramatic opportunity.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 25 points 3 hours ago

This is called verisimilitude. Self consistency. If you present the setting as Our World + Premise, then we are forgiving of the premise part but not so much of the unrelated things that don't match what we were told to expect.

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 36 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

I'll accept whatever the premise of the thing asks of me to enjoy the story; that dragons exist, the main character finds a real spellbook, there's a secret community of shapeshifters, or that there's a long-lost secret artifact with magical properties. It's not a documentary.

But breaking internal logic is different. Unless someone's mentioned time travel, it's still a huge issue that it was Sunday in one scene and Friday in another on the same day.

Some people hate 'The Hulk' because they can buy genetic mutation that turns him giant and green, sure... But where the fuck is the extra body mass coming from? You can't just gain weight from nothing. Yes, magic does exist in the MCU, but he didn't get his powers from magic, did he?!

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Some people hate 'The Hulk' because they can buy genetic mutation that turns him giant and green, sure... But where the fuck is the extra body mass coming from? You can't just gain weight from nothing. Yes, magic does exist in the MCU, but he didn't get his powers from magic, did he?!

My understanding is that hulk gets his strength (and size/mass) from his anger. So in the universe, anger must have energy that hulk converts to mass

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 3 points 48 minutes ago

Right… but then anger itself would require huge amounts of calories. You can’t just create energy.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... Marvel has clearly shown that in their world mutations just unlock some sort of magic. None of the X-Men powers make any sense in a world where conservation of mass / energy is a thing, the only possible explanation is that those genes unlock magic potential, so it's not breaking internal logic, that a specific mutation unlocked some kind of anger-magic in Dr. Banner.

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

True, though I didn’t mean I had a problem with it.

Just that a supposed scientist finding there’s a gene that just lets you break physics and nobody of authority in-universe really commenting on entire branches of modern science being scrapped is too much of a stretch in logic for some.

[–] artifex@piefed.zip 37 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There's suspending disbelief, and then there's suspending disbelief.

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The one that gets me. In all the crazy wild stuff in The Fast and the Furious franchise.

I can't handle the safe drag scene in the 5th movie. There is no way those Chargers could drag a safe full of money with any sort of speed, if at all. I don't care how reinforced the frame is, or how much NOS they throw at it. Even if the thing happened to have wheels on it.

I can accept shit like, cars parachuting from a plane, and cars on ice battling a giant submarine, but not that stupid safe drag chase.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, that scene soured me on the franchise too. The first few were kinda stupid, but you could make an argument that the things they were doing was just regular car shit, albeit pushed the very, very extreme.

Then they yoinked a safe out a reinforced concrete wall with a car, and didn't just tear the fucking towing hitch off? Nah mate.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I walked out of Total Recall(the original) in the final minutes when people got thrown out into the Martian landscape unprotected and their faces blew up like those little stress heads that you squeeze and the eyeballs pop out.

Once you kill my suspension of disbelief, that's it, I'm done.

This is also why I never liked Blade Runner. There were too many violations of known science for me to enjoy the movie.

I will say that scene in Blade Runner where Tyrell is trying to explain why they can’t extend a lifespan and basically just says “all these things create deadly viruses” instead of literally anything more accurate like disrupting the immune system or causing cancer etc. that scene really does piss me off.

Why the hell would repressing a human gene create a virus in the first place?

Also checking “pupillary dilation” and “blush response” but no “it won’t affect the test” if you’re smoking despite the fact nicotine would probably mess with those metrics as well as basically any other biometric like heart-rate or blood pressure.

That being said, I do actually kinda like watching it (or just having it play in the background while I’m doing something else) just for the vibe of the environment. Cyberpunk megastructures? Cassette futurism? Dense but partly abandoned urban infrastructure? Synth jazz playing over shots of a rainy city night? Hell yeah.

(Tbf I’ve only watched the director’s cut so I dont know if the version with Harrison Ford’s voice over makes any glaring mistakes; it definitely ruins the vibe of the movie imo)

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

It irks me when an actor who plays a character so is supposed to be a highly competent gunman doesn't even know the basics of how to hold a gun properly.

[–] misericordiae@literature.cafe 11 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I'm like this when something gets very basic technology wrong.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

“I’ll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic. See if I can track down the IP Address”

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

With scenes like that and the 'two characters typing on the same keyboard to hack faster' one, I'm 90% sure it's just the writers having fun and seeing what they can get away with. Long-running formulaic shows must be boring as hell to write for, so I can understand the impulse.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 hours ago

Or use "complicated technology" to prove some utter bs.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 17 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

There is nothing wrong with this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›