this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

memes

20456 readers
1753 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only if the wealth is redistributed to the masses though.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah exactly. Normal inheritance means their kids or spouse inherit, and the number of billionaires remains the same.

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fun fact, if I were to inherit the wealth of a billionaire family member who was shot in public I’d get philanthropic real fast!

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many people say this. However of those who talk the talk, barely any ever walk the walk.

However I think if you are born an heir to a billionaire, you'd lack the perspective which might foster selfless philanthropy.

I'd like to think that if someone from the working class would randomly get such money they would. But it still seems unlikely.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

self preservation isn't a selfless motive, but if it results in philanthropy then that's a win.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly! If billionaires were put in a a position where they need to stop being billionaires and distribute their wealth or else people will kill them, they'd distribute their wealth real fucking fast

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My OCD wonders if they factored in having to assassinate the heirs of the CEOs who immediately become billionaires, recursively until every fortune has been divvied up so many ways nobody has a billion anymore. Cuz that would be necessary if you really want to "run out" of billionaires, and would also mean you advocate executing children for inheriting a lot of money. This does require thinking beyond the simple meme, but go ahead - you can do it!

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Starting a psyop on 4chan for making edgy school shooter wannabes start aiming at billionaires instead.

"You see anon, it's not that girls don't like you or that your class has 1 non-white person in cornbread America, it's that billionaires are leeches in society, and the cops they own would stop you. Don't fire at classmates, fire at the upper class."

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried to teach socialism for terminally 4chan people, it's hard, and can be immediately undone by /pol/, some other nazi shit, etc.

I did it once, in person, and all it took was food every day for a few months. We all shared our food at lunch instead of keeping it to ourselves, and we all went away more full than we had before. (the reason is that we all got a larger variety of flavors than before, but that's not the point. The point is communism) Never out had to talk about leftism or politics either, people just sort of came around via eating.

[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are 1050 estimated billionaires in the US. In 2024 we've had 38 school shooting related deaths.

So a bit more than 2 months...

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He is not talking about school related deaths but about deaths of school children, so everyone who is still a school age.

[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It specifically says shot. So sure let's expand to include all children shot at school or otherwise.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you actually read?

It says school children being shot. Not "die in school schootings". You do realise children get shot outside of school shootings?

I agreed with you. Why are you responding with rudeness?

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't actually done the math, but by percentages I think they are probably fairly close.

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not hard to look up school shooting fatalities, but it would be depressing

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Welp that sucked.

69 deaths in 2024 (323 school shootings in 1 year. More school shootings than school days. What are you doing there?)*

And

400+ billionaires the poorest is 3.3B

So 2024 had 1 Billionare death, at this rate, we need 399 more years...

*I forgot to add. Both this source and me are not american. Feel free to correct me with a more local source

[–] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 1 points 1 year ago

More numbers for people to play with. "Since 1999, 440 people have been killed and 1,243 injured in shooting events at K-12 schools."

https://www.security.org/blog/a-timeline-of-school-shootings-since-columbine/