this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2026
945 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

89443 readers
4381 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it’s just an excuse, he has interfered before for no valid reason

Yeah, there's no way one rich man should have so much geopolitical power.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

He lives with no valid reason.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 219 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Musk is charging Ukraine $2500 per month per Starlink terminal, for over 250,000 terminals. Musk is making bank for shitty service (it's not fast enough for gaming) and then he cuts services for partisan purposes, costing Ukrainian lives.

The upsell maneuver reminds me of when Verizon tried to do the same thing to California wildfire response services when communications cut out during disaster control efforts. That didn't play well, either.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I just still cannot believe that happened and just...no one cares.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm being pedantic, but there are those of who obviously care that this fuck nugget did this.

Nobody who matters cares.

We don't matter :/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 118 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Goddamn this guy can't go one minute without being a complete piece of shit, his death will brighten my day

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

His death with be celebrated all over the world. I imagine it will be second only to Trump's at this point.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

It will be a toss up between him and Putin and Netanyahu.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

Comcast tiered service

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Teslas in a few years:

"We notice that you're in an uncontrolled spin; uncontrolled spins violate Tesla's terms and conditions; your airbags have been deactivated. Upgrade now to the super spender safety plan for a one off payment of $30k to unlock instant airbag activation".

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (24 children)

The dispute isn't that they're not allowed to use Starlink for murder drones, it's that the murder drone plan is more expensive.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

SpaceX is not actually supposed to even have direct control over Starshield. It uses Starlink infrastructure, but is a military application that is supposed to be under the control of the federal government.

SpaceX shouldn't have the option to pitch different plans.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have been opeque as to whether this is actually starshield or starlink. Elon is not supposed to have any control over starshield - that is supposed to be controlled by the Pentagon.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But also anyone who believes that Musk has no control over Starshield is welcome to start making bids on this Brooklyn Bridge I have for sale

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)

Seems about right.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeaceHolder@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I hope there get to be alternatives to Starlink soon. Ideally it would be a publicly held company that (somehow) limits that no single individual can own more than 1% of the company. Honestly, that's how all publicly traded companies should be set up!!

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Why doesnt ukraine use EutelSat?

[–] bad1080@piefed.social 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

image "pray i don't alter it any further"...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The fact that a country under attack needs to pay for these kind of things is already insane by itself.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

Fuck this absolute cunt who’s the biggest drain on society since Nero.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›