this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
97 points (98.0% liked)

196

7154 readers
2705 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you graduated before they implemented this or aren’t American, the system they started to use to teach kids how to read is called three cuing. They teach kids to identify unknown words by guessing based on clues in pictures with the sentences, what word would ‘make sense’, and whether the answer they came up with looks right based on the first letter.

As you may have noticed, none of that is reading a word. These are strategies that borderline illiterate people will use to try to understand words, and for decades it’s been the method used by many schools across the country.

So that person you’re arguing with online who keeps going off on bizarre rants barely related to anything you said might not be a troll, they might just be functionally illiterate due to having never been taught to read. Yaaay!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] azalea_flower@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 55 minutes ago

(I did make another comment but I was being a little silly)

It's pretty insane to me that they don't teach phonics, since that's very important to actually reading a word, especially aloud. In my original comment I was ignoring that reading included determining the meaning of a word, but I was conflating reading with only reading aloud or simply identifying a word.

Three cueing can be important to reading and would probably help out on the spot, but is something I (and I assume many others) picked up naturally anyway from just reading a lot. I don't expect it to be taught in school instead of phonics, and it should not replace just looking up a word in the dictionary. This just seems absolutely absurd to me.

[–] dumples@piefed.social 3 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

If you are interested APM did a whole podcast about this. I haven't listened but I hear it's great.

https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 minutes ago (1 children)

I knew the kids couldn’t read because I have multiple English teachers in my family, but until I listened to season 1 of that podcast (working through season 2 now) I had no idea it was from them not even being taught the basics of how to read! One guy they interviewed who learned to read fluently as an adult was basically like ‘when I learned I was like, that’s all you do? Why the fuck didn’t anyone teach me this?’

[–] dumples@piefed.social 1 points 12 minutes ago

I mostly read in chunks of words, which I think I learned in school. This also means I can barely spell anything.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 35 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I’m thankful every day for my kid’s Montessori school. 5 years old and I’m already to the point where we read together every night for fun, but I’m not really needed. Sometimes I see the reading light on after bedtime, but I let it slip. 🥹

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 hours ago

good parent ☺️

[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

montessori is crazy, we’ve been doing lovery and their toys are so well designed

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 12 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Parents are both overworked and lazy here in the States, are you surprised our education is faltering? This is by conservative design, the schools are defunded, teachers underpaid, schools are understaffed, under supplied and corrupt. The conservatives want the poor to be their new slaves, and the conservatives need them dumb enough to keep voting for them until the conservatives take that away too.

We're a powder keg waiting to explode while being manipulated and having access to all kinds of guns, at some point things are going to explode, or we'll just boil like the frog.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 3 points 49 minutes ago

I taught both my kids to read the way I learned to read, with phonics, they’re in their early 20d now but grew up as excellent readers

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

My mother was a learning disabilities teacher consultant and hated 3 cuing. Most students sent to her once it started were fine when taught not that way.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 4 points 1 hour ago

Three cuing is aggravating, but once I stopped trying to impose the way I learned on my kid when we were doing homework she figured it out. Also just getting her shit she is actually interested in reading did more than anything else. Not sure how to feel about it, trying not to yell at clouds.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The counterargument is that English is uniquely bad for phonetical spelling.

Never make fun of someone who says a word strangely. They may have only ever read it.

I’m not sure that phonics is the underlying reason American people don’t learn to read. I think there’s deep complex reasons for that.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago

blowing in the wind.

wind the clock.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 hour ago

Sadly, the generation was lost to the war on drugs. We were overzealous and refused to let them even get Hooked on Phonics.

[–] moonshadow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 46 minutes ago

I genuinely believe that this and the 'common core' math stuff are intentional measures to dumb down a population. Not really sure what to do about it though

[–] cowfodder@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

I'm in my mid 40's and American, and I was taught to figure out word meanings from context clues back in elementary school. This isn't a new thing.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 hour ago

If you were taught how to sound out words you weren’t taught the way a lot of kids are taught to read today. Being able to read the whole sentence and guessing based on context already puts you significantly ahead of kids who have been taught with the three cueing method.

[–] rosahaj@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The technique isn't the issue, rather it's the fact that American kids are taught to use context before they're taught to differentiate the words from one another, apparently.

Yeah context clues are super important, but they're not a replacement for phonics

[–] Exeous@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

These not context clues in text but in picture. Little different.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, context clues are a part of it.

Graphic cues come from the letters used in the word, syntactic cues from what part of speech is appropriate for its location in the sentence, and semantic cues from what word would contextually make sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I'm also in my 40s and the wiki article sounded exactly how I read, so I did a little searching and turns out this was the method used in schools in Ontario in the late 80s and 90s although not a formal part of the curriculum until 1997. So no, not a new thing. It was reversed after an inquiry by the human rights commission in 2022.

That might explain why my spouse who grew up in a different part of the province uses phonics and I use... word shapes, idk? I read extremely fast with good comprehension, but can't spell worth a damn lol.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 18 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I learn new words by searching for the definition. Is that not a thing anymore? You don't have to go find a dictionary anymore. You can literally pull out your phone and type: "define xxx". I really hate our education system.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, this is worse than that: it’s not just about their vocabulary being stunted, it’s that they can’t even recognize words they know because they don’t know how to sound out a word. Grim stuff.

[–] X@piefed.world 8 points 1 hour ago

Oh fuck me, that is grim. No way to know what that which you’re looking at means. That’s fucking terrifying! “Huh. The bottle’s got some tall, red letter words and exclamation points. I bet it means that this shit’s gonna taste awesome!”

[–] rosahaj@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 hours ago

And yet, the people who chose to make that change were taught to sound aloud, so really it's anyones game as to whichever outcome's better :P

Three cuing, or at least something like it which I cannot be bothered to check the term for is a valid reading technique, the difference being that it requires a certain degree of reading skill beforehand.

Certainly, you've learned a few words off the page, or television purely through context, and that's essentially 'three cuing'. Issue is, it's not an effective introduction to literacy, as it skips the foundational skills to reading. It was introduced based off studies of adult literacy, I believe.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

But it worked for AI with BERT, so it will work for kids, right?!

/s

I know phonics has issues but at least it creates an internal framework to figure things out. No idea how this new system works, but phonics doesn’t preclude contextual reasoning and it’s tried and true for ages.

How do more symbolic writing languages work? Like Chinese characters where there’s just a huge variety of characters vs English’s Latin alphabet.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 7 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

Wait, this is a real thing? I was handing in a marketing copy and one of my us colleagues mentioned that I was using fairly complicated language that most Americans won't understand. Is that the reason? I thought I had used normal level English that everyone who has learned it as a second language would understand. It never occurred to me that native speakers would have issues? Not in a business context at least?

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

As someone born and raised in the USA, like anything else in our country it's a gradient and not black and white. There are plenty of people who speak eloquently and can engage with an expansive vocabulary.

There also are, I'd wager almost certainly more, people who are borderline functionally illiterate for whom reading is a chore and who actively try to avoid it.

Beyond that, the vast majority of folks can read and write but have a limited lexicon and have not attempted (and probably won't) to grow their knowledge of English words. Most of us just get by and go along.

I don't know why I still am constantly surprised by just how stupid my compatriots are. Maybe I just want to believe in a better world. The sad reality is Americans, as a whole, are pretty goddamn dumb and ignorant and like it that way.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

How it was implemented is going to vary by state and even by school, but this system was used for years in every state. Anyone in their mid 30s and older doesn’t have that excuse, but kids being taught to read in the early 2000s and on were increasingly taught with three cueing alone and no sounding out words, because the theory was basically they just figure it out themselves.

A lot of them did not figure it out themselves.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Yes, if you are writing for the general public you need to keep it simple. A shocking number of people are barely literate, something like 1 in 5 adults in the US are illiterate.

[–] X@piefed.world 5 points 1 hour ago

It’s worse. From a search:

According to the 2023 Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) survey, 28% of U.S. adults scored at or below Level 1 literacy, meaning they struggle with multi-step instructions and complex texts. This represents a 9 percentage point increase in low literacy levels since 2017. Additionally, about 54% of U.S. adults read below a sixth-grade level, and approximately 21% are classified as functionally illiterate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Must be regional, because my 13, 9, and 5 year olds all sounded/are sounding out words in public school 🤷‍♂️

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 hour ago

That’s awesome! And yeah, everything about American education is regional for better or worse. From what I understand it was implemented the most on the west coast and northeast, but some schools in every state used it.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

tbh i dont really remember being taught how to read as a kid, other than i really struggled with lower case l vs capital I because they look exactly the fucking same half the time and autism. anyway i was taught to sound out words but i dont think it really made that much of a difference for me, other than giving me a mediocre ability to say words correctly after only reading them. the biggest thing was having things i was motivated to read. wanting to know wtf the words meant got me to look them up and wanting to know what happens next in the stories i was reading kept me going. the actual being taught how to read part of learning to read is such a tiny part. i think a much bigger issue is the structure of kid prison systematically beating the curiosity out of people.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Congrats on learning how ⅔ of the Turtle Islanders operate day-to-day.
Now you're aware why we insult them with rainbows of derogatories without being ableist about it.
To this day, they are also rank illiterate too.
My wife’s generation was the last to teach civics in junior high, so yes, zoomers & alphies are politically illiterate as well.😔

load more comments
view more: next ›