this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
176 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

89443 readers
4335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 13 minutes ago

Make it so anyone can turn it off πŸ™

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 4 points 35 minutes ago

I'm gonna forward this article to DuckDuckGo and Kagi. I imagine they could help the school district do what Google can't.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 28 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This will backfire hard. It will create students who do not conflate Google with search.

Never interrupt your enemy when he is in the middle of making a big mistake.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 49 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Great! Let's teach kids that "searching the internet" does not have to mean "Google it"

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I've read that young folks have dropped the term and now say "search it". I'll have to ask my young ones. Unfortunately, they often answer in ways they think daddy wants to hear, despite my admonitions to stop that shit.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 21 minutes ago

No they fucking say "chatgpt it" πŸ’€

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 55 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

DuckDuckGo

You are foolish for not using that by now.

[–] nerdo@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 minutes ago

Except the results suck

searxng if youre into self hosting

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

And yes, DDG is Bing results, we know.

[–] original_charles@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe "naΓ―ve" or "ill informed". "Foolish" is pretty harsh.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Foolish is accurate.

Anyone supporting Google, Meta, Musk, Anthropic, Amazon, etc are fools.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The assumption of tech savvy around here is wild! Never been in another online space where people assume everyone is at a reasonable tech level.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago

You've never been on the internet before lemmy?

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Good, keep shooting your self.
Schools all across the world are rejecting AI, this will open the road for alternative search engines.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Another commenter said that the IT admin would simply change the search engine behind the omnibar. Easy money and nothing really changes except the kids betting better search results.

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

Kids shouldn't gamble.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 19 points 4 hours ago

Don't be Evil...be nice to those quarterly reports.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Search should be a public utility at this point.

But then again I don't know how you'd neutrally maintain a search algorithm.

Regardless, depending on a private company for something so fundamental to societal functions seems bad.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You want the government running search?! That's an absolute horror show; you see the impossibility of neutrality.

Here in Florida, "homosexual teen" would lead to sites about conversion camps. We might just score a Democrat in the governor's mansion today, so that would change. And then change again. Imagine the non-stop public fight over what is and is not appropriate to show in a search. AH! (I'm actually having a giggle thinking about such fighting. "Trannie" would lead to results about transmissions one year, a transexual slur the next, banned altogether the next.)

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

At least there would be a non-stop public fight over it, instead of just having to swallow whatever the corpos which captured the government want to put in their search result.

[–] walden@wetshav.ing 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I imagine there'd be even more bribery if search was run by a government.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 hours ago

If search was provided by a government run by a functioning country with strong democratic roots - AKA the west excluding the US - political parties messing with search would cause them to lose voters. Bribery only increases that effect in an actually working structure.

[–] milbyte11@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

the way it worked originally, pagerank. SEO, will never cease sadly; goodhart's law n all, but it's better than what we have now

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

sounds like a great opportunity to drop google from education infrastructure and rely on a more balanced approach of books, papers, and physically handing shit in.

dunno. worked for me when I was in school.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

β€œBe Evil”

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 hours ago

You promise?

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

google: ai summaries are hurting our advertisement revenue

also google: we'll block you if you reject our ai

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

As someone else pointed out, the IT admin will just change the search engine behind the omnibar. Speaking as a sysadmin, I wouldn't put up with a broken search bar, I'd simply fix it. Hell, even consumers have the power to change it in Chrome!

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

To me the title reads as, "Allow us to abuse you or we wont let you be abused by us".

In other words the best solution is to reject both anyway, Fuck ai.

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

DuckDuckGo and Startpage are the way

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Had to switch to DDG on my phone. I rarely browse the internet that way, but when I was sitting in my flea market booth the ads were fucking unbearable.

[–] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago