this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
682 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31806 readers
3345 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In academic discourse, use of the correct name is an important means of establishing professional credibility. For example, if within the fields of computer science and information science, a specific term of art, such as artificial intelligence, has gained widespread acceptance, the use of an alternative term—a term, like superintelligence, not widely accepted within the discipline—would seriously undermine the credibility of academic work (and the author’s more general standing within the field).

Donald Trump has notoriously attempted to rechristen the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.” So too has he attempted to rename Lake Ontario to “Lake America,” and he is threatening to fashion new MAGA names for an ocean, a major river, and the state of New Mexico. Trump also recently signed an executive order requiring all federal government programs and communications to use the terms superintelligence and S.I. rather than the broadly accepted nomenclature artificial intelligence and A.I. One might shrug all of this off and say, “Well, so what? It’s a free country, and all of us can still use the generally accepted names of places (Gulf of Mexico) and things (A.I.).”

Unfortunately, after Oct. 1, 2026, this is no longer the case for academics at state-sponsored colleges and universities in Alabama. H.B. 2 officially bans the use of the phrase Gulf of Mexico by any and all state employees. As a professor at the University of Alabama School of Law, I find this appalling.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fun fact: The President is not in charge of naming gulfs, lakes, oceans, continents, islands, or even people.

They can name their own children and pets. That's it. Thank you.

[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 142 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Suddenly, conservatives are upset about deadnaming. 🙄

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

It's called 'Merica-naming now

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Historically, it is known as the Gulf of Mexico, and so to avoid confusion we will refer to it as such in this course as that's what all our textbooks refer to it as."

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

officially bans the use of the phrase Gulf of Mexico by any and all state employees.

These aren't banned.

Gulf of Epstein
Gulf of Iran
Western Persian Gulf
Gulf of Latin America
Gulf of New Mexico

[–] DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago

"Antifa® Presents The Gulf of Mexico"

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The Gulf that used to be known as Mexico, it still is, but it used to, too.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

And if you refuse? What are they going to do if you keep calling it by its proper name? This is clearly censorship by a government entity. Any retaliation would immediately lead to a First Amendment lawsuit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago

Do it anyway, get unlawfully fired, sue, get rich.

[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Efforts to control speech in Alabama’s educational institutions constitute just one part of a larger national effort to standardize speech and, by necessity, thought. Happily, however, the First Amendment not only protects the use of particular words but also extends to a person’s choice of language.

What a waste of time and money in all this BS. maga cuts help for people but wastes money on trash like this renaming and vanity projects, he/they are pathetic and weak. This is how dictators behave to spread their lies and force conformity. These efforts go back to the powell memo and all the other gop ones since then, including the 2025 plan that's over half done.

[–] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Defy orders and call it by the correct name anyway - Gulf of Mexico. Either stand up to tyranny and the things you believe in or choose your battles; it's really each individual's prerogative.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How is this not a first amendment thing? Since this is a state run public institution, so essentially the government, controlling what private citizens say. Just because it’s a law doesn’t mean it’s constitutional.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait 'till you hear about laws banning criticism of Israel

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Lol, I can't wait until they start arresting Jewish people for being antisemitic then

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It probably is. It's been just over a month since the law was inacted. It usually takes months for the court cases to even start. First someone needs to be "harmed" to have standing. So now this guy could sue and say it's deteriorating his academic credibility. But it would be months, maybe a half year or more before it finally hits the state supreme court to be overturned.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

Somebody needs to use the phrase in a document, get punished for it by the state. THEN they've been harmed, and they'll have standing to sue.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Maybe you should move to another state, like New America, or something.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

do it anyway. fuck google

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Can't wait for the academics of the USA to be forced to only interact with each others because they live in an alternative reality.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Isn't this the government overreach they're always harping on about ..

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

It was always projection. Every single time.

The Republican Party does nothing but government overreach.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dou9m@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

People still think this is the land of freedom lol. I’d guess 70% of Alabama doesn’t care about this, how far off am I as someone who hasn’t gotten to experience the people IRL?

[–] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 25 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Florida passed a similar law, but I am yet to meet a serious person, emphasis on serious, that actually calls it gulf of america. Only the die hard bootlickers are on board with this. In an unrelated irony, the locals are also set to sink the SS united states, a historic vessel, in the gulf of Mexico (america for the idiots) in the next week. The timing is very apt.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mexico, Gulf of

Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl

Or… British Petroleum Thunderdome

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Let's all bow down to our idiotic president. It's depressing how little pushback there is to this kind of shit.

[–] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Your students can say it. Have them say it in chorus whenever it comes up. "Gulf of..." "Mexico!"

Between colleagues? Fuck that law.

In writing, I suppose you're stuck with it.

[–] visnae@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

(The gulf formerly known as) Gulf of Mexico, or (The gulf with the international name) Gulf of Mexico, wouldn't work?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer. I'm 99.99% sure that if the institution is state run (like a university of Alabama situation), then they open themselves to civil rights litigation if they were to fire you for this.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Civil rights litigation with a Nazgûl Supreme Court majority doesn’t mean much

[–] JamieDub86@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago

When are they going to ban books and studying, or say stupidity is intelligence?

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You can’t even call it the gulf formerly known as the Gulf of Mexico? Like the history doesn’t even count?

[–] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 19 points 2 days ago

Most just call it the Gulf to get around this stupidity

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 11 points 2 days ago

We've always been at war with Eurasia typa shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

The cons are some of the most petty of snowflakes.

What are they going to do if people use the right name for the Gulf of Mexico?

[–] moxyy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every record has been destroyed or falsified … every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered.... welcome to the Trump United States of America America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I say the University of Al Banana and I can do whatever we want.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

So how do history teachers do their jobs? That some very Alabama legislation.

[–] schwifty_squanch@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

How about saying "Mexico's Gulf" to get around this stupid law?

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, right. The Gulf. The Mexican Gulf, the Gulf named especially for Mexico, Mexico's Gulf. That Gulf?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Malicious compliance: just say “the gulf”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

This says a lot more about the US education system than Trumps decree

load more comments
view more: next ›