this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
479 points (99.8% liked)

memes

23325 readers
2013 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 31 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Same as it ever was. The uppers fuck up and labour has to do ethics and security training.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 6 points 32 minutes ago

I recently received an email from the office of Marco Rubio reminding me of the importance of ethical behavior as a government employee. My eyes couldn't have rolled back further in my head when I read that.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Some companies are just as ethically bankrupt all the way down to the mailroom.

Once, I worked at a place that had, and I kid you not: "Ethics awareness training."

Said presentation had a few slides dedicated to mandatory legal matters and that was it. Ethics? Training? Awareness? Nevermind all that, did you know that we've always had Eurasia as a loyal customer? I didn't stick around for very long.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 1 points 42 minutes ago

If the leaders don’t take accountability or ethics seriously, why should the employees?

[–] ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

"I'll suck your dick if you click this link." Has a different ring to it.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Why is my company's cybersecurity training limited to simulated phishing emails and online courses?

Maybe next year's cybersecurity budget should include some for hot-looking models (of every gender).

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Penetration testing just got another meaning

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And additional threat layers.

[–] NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

And those added layers actually have the benifit of making boundary traversal more difficult.

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 hour ago

IT security here. We tried, the CFO keeps denying our requests.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

c-suite doesn't take those trainings. typically they will get all sorts of exceptions from IT too, because they are in charge.

Only the peon workers get secured/locked down IT stuff.

also hot babes are not going to bonk you for your company secrets unless you're in executive management.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 32 points 2 hours ago (4 children)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 41 minutes ago

Gotta deploy the "ugly" test in all such matters:

Would this situation be sus if the other party was unattractive to me?

You would not believe how many things this filters out. Sales, advertising, cons, youtube videos, instragram, tiktok nonsense, the list goes on.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 17 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

someone that looks like that, I'm taking them to pound town.

he's so old and frail, it doesn't even look like he could fight back.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 3 points 37 minutes ago

Something something you had me in the first half

[–] uber_chicken@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair, I'd fall for this too. Zero chance I'm turning her down

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

While being very old and married? Okay i guess

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 minutes ago

Not sure if you are making an argument for or against?

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

There's hooking up and then there's hooking up with someone you're in business with and helping her do illegal shit at the risk of your job.

[–] log@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 29 minutes ago

With a golden parachute worth hundreds of millions, I’d be risking my job everyday.

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 4 points 1 hour ago

Could've been me tbh

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

CEOs are the most targeted, and the least likely to doubt their own decisions.

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, most of the NVIDIA employees are millionaires. I'm sure they'll be ok.

*Source, I do know a NVIDIA employee and he's well off now.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

At least two amazon workers are millionaires too, i assume they all are

[–] Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

If you look up median, or average, net worth of Nvidia employees you will find that according to internal survey, at least 76% of employees are worth over 1 million dollars, with 50% being worth more than 25 million.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

they own like 3 GPU or something?

[–] Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au 2 points 52 minutes ago
[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago) (1 children)

Shit, I mean they only have like 3 departments that actually need staff with their manufacturing pretty much entirely automated. Purchasing, sales, and r&d. Purchasing is likely a stressful job there and probably paid worse than the others. Sales is dwindling as they move more of their sales to long term b2b contracts. They probably have less people on that team than they used to, and those people are likely in charge of very large accounts. Then they have a very large very well paid r&d department.

All of this makes me wonder how many employees they even have. It can't be that many when compared to more traditional manufacturing industries.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au 2 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

Workforce Breakdown

• Research & Development (R&D): Roughly 31,000 employees (about 74% of the workforce) work in R&D and engineering.

• Operations & Support: About 11,000 employees handle sales, marketing, operations, and administrative roles.

• Geography: Approximately 55% of Nvidia's workforce is based in North America, with the remainder distributed across regions like South Asia and East Asia.

this data is from revelio labs, and seems to be acked up by Macrotrends and Yahoo Finance