this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
246 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

74496 readers
3801 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 5 hours ago

I suggest we create a new international coalition called NUS for Not US and present a united front of all-or-nothing, so that Trump can't put pressure on individual countries anymore.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

Free market, bitch.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 12 points 13 hours ago

It's crazy how hard his little penis gets over tariffs, and he doesn't understand how they work

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

This thing called sovereignty...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no not tariffs, we won't be able to afford... wait, hang on, we don't pay them do we? Carry on.

[–] jsonjson@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Right, except the tariff gets baked into the price your importer pays to bring the product into the US. So while you don't cut a check to the US Treasury, your buyer does, and that either makes your product less competitive or forces you to eat the cost in your margins. But yeah, "carry on".

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 11 points 16 hours ago

So far foreign companies don't appear to be eating the cost. So the impact to their competitiveness seems to not be high enough to force them. It's likely to stay that way.

It's important to understand that if you place tariffs on all imports of a certain good, you also incentivize domestic manufacturers to increase their prices to just below those of the taxed imports, at least as long as domestic supply is lower than domestic demand (so they can expect to sell all they have anyway).

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 14 hours ago

Except if the product was available commercially in the United States they wouldn't have been importing it in the first place, and they're not going to step up factories in, how long has he been in power, 6 months, it only feels like forever.

If tariffs worked a senior president would have implemented the more subtly.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 109 points 1 day ago (3 children)

European Union, stand up to this bully, you're the second second largest economy, act like one.

best i can do is shoot myself in the knees

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 33 points 1 day ago

With how things are going is might become the largest one

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We kinda need all support we can get considering the blood-thirsty bear to the east. It would be very unwise at this point to go and poke the big hungry bear on the west. We can defend ourselves with a few sticks at best at this point. Or we have a bazooka, but politicians unwilling to use anything but a stick. One of those two.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is the big hungry bears are looking at y'all trying to figure out how to divvy your area up, and only thing keeping the Trump one from just cozying completely up to the other is his inability to stick with a thought process for more than five minutes.

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

We are aware of the problem, but don't really have a magic wand to create our own mineral and energy resources overnight, including production lines for advanced chips, defense, train a proper army all while maintaining social plans and investment into infrastructure. The time for solving the problem is long gone, and now the only thing remaining is to do the best we can under the current circumstances.

If we go to a trade war with Trump, we will also deteriorate the our economy and Trump can pull his military support leaving us with both economic downturn and extremely weakened defence capabilities. This can't possibly be better than playing along, for now.

A simple thing would be to cut a lot of social programs and finance more pressing matters, but we know how the people will react to it...

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"discriminate" is a bad faith use of vocabulary.

What Trump means is that those nation-states are expressing sovereignty.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Yes and it mirrors his beliefs on young girls expressing sovereignty over their bodies too.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 105 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Give me what I want or I'll tax my population SO HARD! I don't get it.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 8 points 17 hours ago

He bankrupted a casino. That's all you need to get.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market by a factor of 3. So it’s more accurate to say “Give me what I want or I’ll take away a sizable chunk of your customers, potentially causing you financial ruin”

You and I both know that the U.S. won’t just magically and instantly stand up its own production to replace your countries market, but in this case he just needs American companies to start importing from a different foreign country with lower tariffs. The effect this has on your country depends on how much your country’s GDP comes from exports to America, but it’s potentially very harmful.

As an American this sucks because long term, long after this dude is gone, our trading partners will have already adjusted who they’re exporting to in order to absorb a loss like this, and I doubt that’d change for decades.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

European markets don't tend to send the US products, it tends to be services. There isn't anyone else, at least there isn't anyone else who doesn't already also have tariffs on them.

He went tariff mad a little while ago and decided to put tariffs on everyone, including nations who've never traded with the United States because they have a population of six people and 3,000 koalas.

Edit grammar

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Plenty of EU countries export a significant portion of their extra-EU goods for export to the U.S. , many of which are around 20-25%. Ireland tops the charts with a whopping 46%.

Overall goods you’re still talking about ~10%. I’m sure that number will be shrinking substantially over the next decade.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well you see he's a profoundly stupid man that sincerely believes tariffs are paid by the producer, not the importer and he's so sure of himself that it's literally impossible that he is wrong about anything, ever.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

He was wearing a cap with “Trump was right about everything” in a recent event, right? Who does that?

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brainwashing and propaganda to sell internally. He's preping all americans to hate everything that is outside of them and to blame on those pesky other bad countries. He's basically ensuring he has enough bodies to use for war.

[–] III@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I see these countries building their trade with counties other than the US as the only good part of Trump's tarrif tantrums. Less reliance on the US is better for everyone, even the US. Because it will force us (I am American) to have to participate globally without the strong arming bullshit we have always relied upon. It will force us to actually work with others.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like three days after ‘normalizing trade with the EU’, it’s right back to antagonizing and tariff threats. Who could have seen this sudden reversal coming?

when will they learn you cant negotiate with terrorists?

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago

trump now demands DEI.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 day ago

The same US Tech that Donated MILLIONS of Dollars and Gold Statues to Trump? What a WEIRD but NOT CORRUPT Coincidence!

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm still pissed that Canada dropped theirs. It's not discriminatory, it's for all online services. Trump just wants to make his tech billionaire friends happy.

[–] anomie@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The online services tax. Right now foreign companies can exploit the Canadian internet users and not pay a penny in taxes for it.

They dropped it because Trump was using it as an excuse to block trade negotiations. They dropped it and the negotiations still went no where. Canada is still paying higher tariffs than Russia. Let that sink in. Canada needs to speed up their decoupling if their economy from the US and bring back that tax.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Don't tell Trump, but our effective tariff rate is actually quite low because the USMCA exempts a huge amount of goods from them. Shh. He probably has no idea that's in there, even though he's the guy who negotiated it last time he was in office.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again why are we taking the demented orange turd seriously in any capacity? This isn't news this is the ramblings of a brain long turned to pudding

[–] Steve@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is an angry child with a loaded gun to be taken seriously?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

He's pointing it down his own throat though.

Do what I want or I will crash my own economy is not much of a threat.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is not discrimination…

This is also one note point on why we need to diversify from us tech.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

not just diversity but abandon wherever you can

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I’ve got a new PC arriving tomorrow ready to be loaded with Linux, my phone runs Graphene, my cloud data is here in Canada or the EU…

I’m getting there!

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago

Each day I think he can't get more stupid, and each day I'm wrong.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

American consumer is about to be impotent so it's not really relevant

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

What about the tariffs on countries that want to see what's in the Epstein files?

[–] drath@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Haha, thanks, please do.