this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
252 points (98.8% liked)

politics

31093 readers
1729 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.ph/GV6XH

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 116 points 1 year ago (3 children)

[S]he claims to fear for her safety.

I mean, good? That’s what happens when you’re an atrocious human being.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From whom though? Matt Stone and Trey Parker?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hear small poorly-trained puppies are her nemesis

Honestly the credit scene from last weeks South Park are just 👨‍🍳 💋 on that front

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Air Buds are coming for her.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don’t see an issue here.

except it's not true

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh, I honestly wasn't expecting a third amendment violation from this administration.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah that's only for quartering troops in civilian homes. This bitch did an uno reverse and quartered a civilian in military housing. Totally fine.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the exact opposite of what's in the constitution, so prostitution, I think?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How the fuck have I never seen that pro/con before?

[–] Klear@quokk.au 16 points 1 year ago

Congress being the opposite of progress is another good one.

[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Square Root of the 3rd Amendment

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Squatter? I thought the law and order crowd hated those.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

Only when it's a poor

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is pure satire. Most sane & intelligent peoples will understand if they read the previous sentence.

I absolutely do not have any red flag warnings next to my name for behavior that has been determined to be a non cause for alarm and/or any of the same for any issues that are deemed a possible risk for unpredictable and dangerous behavior. Yeah, none of that. What is her address? I really would like to procure this information. Her accessibility should be always present. She is actually a public servant. I have some requests. I also have a special delivery from some dog lovers out there.