this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
221 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25238 readers
2725 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.ph/GV6XH

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This is pure satire. Most sane & intelligent peoples will understand if they read the previous sentence.

I absolutely do not have any red flag warnings next to my name for behavior that has been determined to be a non cause for alarm and/or any of the same for any issues that are deemed a possible risk for unpredictable and dangerous behavior. Yeah, none of that. What is her address? I really would like to procure this information. Her accessibility should be always present. She is actually a public servant. I have some requests. I also have a special delivery from some dog lovers out there.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 104 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

[S]he claims to fear for her safety.

I mean, good? That’s what happens when you’re an atrocious human being.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

except it's not true

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

From whom though? Matt Stone and Trey Parker?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 64 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I hear small poorly-trained puppies are her nemesis

Honestly the credit scene from last weeks South Park are just 👨‍🍳 💋 on that front

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, I don’t see an issue here.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 60 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, I honestly wasn't expecting a third amendment violation from this administration.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 49 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Nah that's only for quartering troops in civilian homes. This bitch did an uno reverse and quartered a civilian in military housing. Totally fine.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 28 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's the exact opposite of what's in the constitution, so prostitution, I think?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How the fuck have I never seen that pro/con before?

[–] Klear@quokk.au 14 points 13 hours ago

Congress being the opposite of progress is another good one.

[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The Square Root of the 3rd Amendment

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 27 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Squatter? I thought the law and order crowd hated those.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 11 points 14 hours ago

Only when it's a poor