this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
194 points (94.1% liked)

politics

28830 readers
2409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muxika@lemmy.world 84 points 4 months ago (6 children)
[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

At JD's every couch is a love seat.

[–] muxika@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The plastic on the furniture is for your protection.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 9 points 4 months ago

Hmm polyester and fabric

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

"...though you've had more people on you than my couch"
"Are you calling me a slut?"
"No, I'm just unlikeable."

[–] Bring_Back_Buggy_Whips@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

"You smell like my ~~cou~~chas lounge."

[–] Curmuffin@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago

She went to J. and she got the D.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 3 points 4 months ago

Fast moving leather upholstery coming in HOT.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hence the leather pants.

“I wanna be between your cushions.”

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 76 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wow! That is moving fast. She is luring him in with her black leather pants. She loves power. He loves upholstery. He can't resist. GOP perversion/hypocrisy at its finest.

[–] Curmuffin@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

I'd have thought that Vance liked a bit more "cushion for the pushin'" than that. Guess he'll take what he can get. Which in this case is Charlie Kirk's professional widow.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Correction, her upholstered black leather cooch.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 65 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So, he has to dump the brown wife, win full custody of his Christian kids, and marry the white widow all by early 2027?

I'm sure they can do that. We all know evangelicals don't give a fuck about any of this.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago

Those kids are not pure enough for his constituents. He will deliberately lose custody and then whine ahout how the system is biased against fathers.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Public opinion is irrelevant. There's not gonna be legitimate elections again, and the oligarchs control the media the 99% consume.

Only 50% of Americans blame R's for the shutdown ffs. Wake up! The US is collapsing under the weight of its own corruption.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later that debt is paid."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Vance will deport his wife and kids as an example to be led by.

He'll talk about how it's a sacrifice that needs to be made and how it's actually beneficial for them. He's actually the victim of the success of making America great again. But it's a sacrifice he is willing to make.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 58 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"No one will ever replace my husband," she told the crowd. "But I do see some similarities of my husband in JD— in Vice President JD Vance. I do. And that's why I am so blessed to be able to introduce him tonight."

Her husband's been dead five minutes and he's married. Gross.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

The hug, I could maybe understand, but that comment is either weird or performative. I'm leaning towards the latter, given her husband's background as a performative mouthpiece for the right. She seems like she's basically giving her and her dead husband's endorsement to this administration. They can't help themselves from jerking each other off in front of everyone. "It's ok that we act like this because we're doing it together." and "the left is trying to break us apart, if we don't stick together while we act terrible then we'll all be alone again."

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are disappearing people illegally. Who gives a single flying fuck about the interpersonal relationships of these two ghouls? The only relationship they should have is with the other inmates in federal prison.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 11 points 4 months ago

I don't really give a shit about the East Wing either, but whatever catches people's attention and turns public attention against these losers is useful.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"No one will ever replace my husband, but..."

-words uttered by no faithful widow, ever.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

He's dead, she can move on whenever she wants...

He, on the other hand, is still married and needs to at least have the balls to divorce his wife before he moves on her.

She's garbage but, in this situation, he's entirely responsible for his actions.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 25 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I dunno, seems like a stretch to me. This particular drama probably says more about our touch-averse culture, or starvation for constant political drama.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 8 points 4 months ago

In isolation perhaps, though I'd consider the whole thing in poor taste regardless. The circumstances and timing doesn't exactly help however.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 4 months ago

Projection is our favorite pass time

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, did someone say Epstein files? 🤔🫩🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

Here's a more appropriate take.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Yeah, because that is how you hug a significant other. Weird shit going on behind the scene at a republican gathering.

[–] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

The hand on the back of his head for a hug? ...yuck.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Motherfuckers are trying to make Goebbels into Malcom X.

[–] HuskerNation@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 4 months ago

Jds wife knows how much he loves pleather

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

oh please, this is the republican version of an arranged marriage.

Here’s my conspiracy brain take. With turnips rapidly declining health, they know they need the next puppet to take his place. J.V. dunce is all they’ve got but his wife will never be accepted by the cult. So, this kirk shit happens and all of the sudden they have an already cult approved stepford wife, complete with a perfect sympathy story for cover (‘he was helping me with my grief and it just happened like it was meant to be from god!’).

If any of this happens, it just feels too cooked up, a desperate throw of the dice. But, I think the magats are just the right kind of stupid and evil for it to work.

This is all just insane ramblings of a bored nerd.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Go deeper conspiracy brain, Erika is actually a sexpionage handler positioning to be first lady.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

He has the hots for his Horst Wessel's wife.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My brain is insisting that this was a perfectly innocent embrace. The alternative is to imagine JD banging her and that just not a mental picture I am willing to endure.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 24 points 4 months ago

"Fuck me like one of your french cushions "

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

I thought they were outraged by people disrespecting Charlie. And now his widow is disrespecting him like this not even 2 months later.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

JD & Erika sitting in a tree

K-I-S-S-I-N-G

First comes love

Then comes m̶a̶r̶r̶i̶a̶g̶e̶ JD divorces his brown wife & starts paying her child support

Then comes ̶a̶ ̶b̶a̶b̶y̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶b̶a̶b̶y̶ ̶c̶a̶r̶r̶i̶a̶g̶e̶ Do whatever you want, JD & Erika. You're g̶r̶o̶w̶n̶ corrupt adults.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

“You’ll convert to Catholicism for me, won’t you?”

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 5 points 4 months ago

Of course we already knew that these people were utter failures as human beings and walking advertisements for the benefits of early abortion, but it's still unnerving to witness the abyssal depths they willfully sink to.

Then again, I suppose it's only to be expected from a bunch of bottom feeders.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

They fucking.

🤢

[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

maybe they killed him for this or maybe it is one sider move by Erika

[–] HuskerNation@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago

She has being flotus in her cross hairs for sure

load more comments
view more: next ›