Angrydeuce

joined 1 week ago
[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I thought this was a common thing lol

I've been ordering twice as many fries as I actually want because after 15 years of marriage I goddamn well know that despite her saying she doesn't want any fries she's going to eat half my fries lol

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

When it’s possible to give the same flexibility to everybody, that should be done of course, but it’s not always the case.

That's the crux of the argument, and one that I, as a father, side with the childless people.

Yes, they should get the same flexibility afforded to parents. 1000% But the problem comes in here: "When it's possible..."

Ask yourself why that's not always the case. The answer, of course, is that payroll is treated by virtually every business owner on the planet as pretty much a min/max game. Minimum wage possible for maximum productivity/profitability. It's not even just limited to having proper staffing levels...I've worked at places that would fire people for not accepting a promotion due to being in their current position for "too long" and having accumulated annual raises to the point where they made a whole few dollars more per hour then their colleagues in the same position...it wasn't even enough that they'd been there for years and were twice as productive, they needed to climb the ladder so they would be an underpaid supervisor instead of an "overpaid" worker. That's all that mattered.

The question people should be asking is why something like a single coworker being out of the office unexpectedly has such a large impact to the rest of the group. Why they're running so close to the bone so fucking always that all it takes is one or two people to get the flu and the whole fucking office is suddenly falling behind. The only reason that happens is because their employer lives in complete mortal terror each and every single day that they may be paying someone a full time wage and only getting 80% productivity in return. They would rather have all their people work at 100% all of the time, and then when someone gets sick or god forbid breeds, have the rest of their employees just work at 120% to keep up. Because that is cheaper for them then having an extra body around and the whole office working at 80% when someone isn't out. They don't care about burnout, they don't care about work/life balance. They care about getting, at a minimum, 100% output from someone working 100% of the time...or rather, they will settle for 100%, but if you made it 110%, hey, here's a pizza party a few times a year, aren't I magnanimous?!

This is just one of the many methods the ownership class uses to divide us. They tell you that so and so went out on maternity leave and there's just nothing they can do, they just need everyone else to work harder to make up for it, as if the possibility of hiring another person so that you can be down someone and still cruise along without everyone busting their ass like lunatics trying to stay afloat never existed in the first place.

Don't be mad at the people with kids. Don't be mad at the people without kids. Be mad at your employer who just refuses to have more than the barest minimum payroll at all times so that people can't even get sick without feeling fucking guilty to their teammates as if it's their fault that their boss won't build in a buffer.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I skip the juice, but coffee plus a cigarette is pretty much laxative in my experience lol

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I just tune those people out. Advocating for a child free existence is all well and good, and believe me, there isnt a parent on this planet that hasn't had a split second thought about how much easier it was before they had kids at some point or another.

But when it crosses the line to militancy, sorry but people are gonna breed, and whether they think thats appropriate or not frankly isnt their concern and their opinion on that carries precisely as much weight with me as my opinion to have children likely has on them...literal none.

But whatever they do, dont call having kids some kind of path to fuckin easy street. If they think that is the case, I invite them to come over and take care of my kids for a couple days and see how much fun it is.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Dude seriously. I had a whopping two weeks off for my paternity leave and people were seriously acting like Id just come back from holiday.

The first week I literally lived at the hospital (major complications with the delivery). The second week I was home with the infant alone as my wife wasnt released yet. What vacation? I slept like 24 hours total in two weeks time.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I knew that the people running the show were scumbags, but i guess I never knew they were MAGA scumbags.

I should have made the switch after their API horseshit, but I guess a lesson learned late is better than not learning the lesson at all.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I got permanently banned for insinuating Donald Trump was a pedophile. I appealed and they blew me off, no response. Tried to sign up for another account and got immediately IP banned for ban evasion.

Id been on the platform for 14 years and had over 1M comment karma. Somehow the last 14 years of my contributions to the site never caused anything, not even so much as a subreddit ban, but pointing out that Donald Trump is a sexual predator was a bridge too far for them.

I find it curious that Reddit Admins are trying to limit discussion of the factual statement that our current president is a documented child rapist. Guess the investors theyre courting are probably in the files, or at the very least, dont see nothin wrong with a little pedorasty.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was a place near me called Smut N Eggs. Was a bar that catered to graveyard shift, we'd swing there after work at 6 in the morning to kickstart our "evening". Inside where you would expect to see sports games on the TVs around the bar, they had vintage porn playing. The walls were covered with centerfolds.

The waitress, Michelle or Chele for short, was about 50 years old, had a smokers rasp and the look of someone who'd spent most of her younger years riding on a motorcyle, and suffered absolutely no bullshit. The food was amazing, the vast majority of people weren't even looking at the screens, they were just digging into their dinner or breakfast at 6 in the morning with a beer or three on the side.

Place burned down years ago...damned shame.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Literally, there was a massive fire near here at the sole grocery store for like a 5 mile radius and it got to the point where the county had to step in and provide a grant for free ubers and shit while the store was being rebuilt because there was no realistic alternative mode of transportation...the other stores weren't on bus lines and to boot it was high summer, like 90°F and 90% humidity out...the city had already had to roll out cooling centers because seniors were getting heatstroke due to their AC being busted, there was no way they were walking or biking 5 miles for groceries in that or they'd have been dead on the side of the road.

It makes more sense to a European to think of the US less as a country and more as basically the EU. We're not a monolithic people from coast to coast. Decrying a lack of broad action across the US is like expecting broad, coordinated action in Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Poland, Romania and Austria. We're bound by the same federal laws, but the laws on a state to state basis, literally all laws not explicitly granted to the Federal Government, belong to the states.

The difference between Wyoming and Massachusetts might as well be the difference between Finland and Croatia. Culturally, economically, geographically, different climate, different racial makeup, different religious persuasions...the farther you get from one state, the more different things become...take someone from the upper midwest and have them talk to someone that grew up deep in Southern Louisiana. They're both speaking English but watch how difficult it is for them to communicate. These are both people that hail from the same country. And that's even ignoring the fact that there are much higher concentrations of people here who don't speak even like, emergency English then even countries where English isn't their mother tongue. Go watch some police bodycam videos and see how often entire extended families have like a token 12 year old that can speak english fluently that is basically speaking for the whole family when the cops are initially rolling up to the scene.

I guess with all that Im just trying to say...people need to ease up on throwing shade at the people of the US as if we are complicit in this because we're using all our energy to keep our heads above water. This scenario is literally unprecedented in this country, there has never been a time when a single branch of government so effectively demolished the checks and balances that were designed to prevent it from happening. We literally have a domestic military force with as much firepower and resources as the actual military in the form of ICE, the FBI, the police, the National Guard, Homeland Security...little different situation then a bunch of beat cops with batons and riot gear standing at the end of the street to make sure that the protest doesn't spill over into traffic.

It's not as simple as people are making it out to be.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

It bears mentioning that the large scale protests you see in other parts of the world are often in places where there are strong worker protection laws.

In the US almost every single person is literally one major medical incident away from living in their car, one missed mortgage payment away from living in their car, and one missed insurance payment from not getting the medicine they literally need to survive. Most US states allow an employer to fire one of their employees without any warning or cause whatsoever, so long as the reason for the termination doesn't fit into one of several small boxes...which they would need to admit for it to be actionable, anyway.

My point being, a big part of the reason why you don't see protests like you do in say, France, is that unlike France, the people here are largely wage slaves that cannot afford to even miss work when suffering from extreme illness, let alone to take to the streets over that asshole pedophile acting like an asshole pedophile. This has been by design.

Don't mistake a population of people spending all their energy holding onto the little they have for one that supports this regime. Whether you think their action or lack of action is justifiable, you need to at least admit it's understandable.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Only positive thing he ever contributed to the world.

Its a shame more of the people today that emulate him don't commit fully and do the same thing, and just spare us all the bullshit suffering, before it inevitably finds itself there anyway, which it will...it always does eventually. Their way is not sustainable.

They're like the randoms I get playing chess online that refuse to lay down their fucking King when a mate is inevitable. They'll even say as much in the game chat. Like for fucks sake, can we not?

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude, seriously. Work phone/personal phone. The two never touch in any way, not even for so much as alternate contact method. I don't want my bank calling my work phone. I don't want my clients calling my personal. When Im not working the work phone gets set down next to the bed and doesn't get picked up again until the next time Im getting up and ready for work.

I truly do not understand how people can even tolerate having both of these parts of their lives on the same device. Is the hardship of two phones really that insurmountable for people when the benefits are so readily apparent?

view more: next ›