DisgruntledGorillaGang

My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn't make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.

Literally not at all what I said. Put that shit back in your ass where it belongs.

Slop ≠ sloppy, and the opposite of slop is not precise.

The fuck does that sentence even mean?

The whole point though is that everybody is supposed to get equal representation.

Not necessarily. Just because someone at one time didn't think it had value, that doesn't mean nobody ever would think it didn't have value.

Lmao, clearly its a trap. Nobody puts that much money in a wallet like that. Just walk away.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.

And millions of people enjoy trash mobile games that throw microtransactions at you every couple of minutes. Popularity is not an indicator of quality.

They weren't idiots either. They weren't stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

That's blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren't common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn't be improved.

No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.