Good news, we've had that for almost 100 years:
Read Soviet Democracy(Pat Sloan, 1937) on ProleWiki https://share.google/A2wORPR6VfQAi4E5B
DudleyMason
joined 1 month ago
Because that's the only reasonable explanation for their actions. They can't possibly be as incompetent as they're pretending. "They're not trying to win, they're trying to ensure you keep enough faith in the system to prevent you from revolting" is the Occams Razor explanation.
Yep sure is
Yeah, the same moderately sized group that calls for single payer health care, living wages, etc, etc. The people who actually run the party keep them around to keep their left flank just hopeful enough not to defect to the Greens or PSL, and work hard to ensure they are never allowed any actual power to affect anything in the party that might make the donors sad.
Lol, somebody's never had a coked out bathroom hookup and it's kinda sad.
Sex can involve that kind of intimacy. So can a really deep conversation while cuddling. Sex doesn't have to involve that kind of intimacy, and would be far less likely to as a whole if idiots would stop teaching children it's a special and magical thing that should be sacrosanct if not being used for "creating a stable pair bond".
This kind of thinking is one half a step removed from "sex is so special and magical that people who have it in a different way than me are perverts and should be imprisoned or executed", or the flip side of that same impulse: "sex is so special and magical that the women I want to have sex with should be held in a gilded prison guarded by eunuchs to ensure only I ever fuck them".
So my question stands. I knew what you meant, now explain why sex is a special sphere of human activity that is materially different from any other human interaction without resorting to magical thinking.
only if you essentially do not view sex as any more sacred, or complex and meaningful, than food...
Why on Earth would anyone who isn't indoctrinated into a religion ever think that sex is more sacred than any other form of human interaction?
but there are a surprising amount of Democrats against RCV.
Why is it surprising? RCV threatens their power just as much as the GOP's.
Why are there so many Nazi soldiers on that list?
So you stan revisionists and traitors?
What's the difference then?
Looks like we have a genocide stanning, Blue MAGA party loyalist, just in time for the next election, what a strange coincidence.