IcedRaktajino

I can understand that speeds vary by area, but it's not like it's difficult at all to have those in a database where a web tool can return them based on your zip code. But yeah, it was like that when I signed up with Optimum (nee Suddenlink) years ago.

The other thing they do is require a truck roll for any kind of hookup. They almost got some of my business back but were so rigid that I said "the hell with it". My fiber provider was having some growing pains and I called Optimum to reactivate my service on a lower plan to use as a backup connection (I work from home). All they needed to do was setup the account and re-authorize my modem (my hookup was still live and I had my own modem). They flat out refused to do any of that and required a tech to come "within 3-5 business days" and read the modem serial number to them to activate it. So I said hell with it, called T-Mobile, and activated my old 5G hotspot.

I would guess it's not just Comcast. Optimum serves my area and they've basically been begging people to switch back since this area got fiber a few years ago.

Their offers are like $25/mo for 200/10 Mbps and no data caps. But they're not guaranteeing the price. Seems like they're going after the lower end of the market.

I basically say "boo hoo". This is what actual competition looks like. Cable companies have sat on their ass and milked their infrastructure for decades (only updating the headend equipment to keep up).

Optimum cold called me once and I flat out told them if they wanted me back, they need to run fiber to my home, give me the same symmetrical speed I have now, for at least $10 less than I'm paying my fiber provider, and lock that price for at least 5 years. The rep basically kinda sighed, so I guess they've heard that response from more than just me.

And i do free upgrades when it makes sense (tall people and passengers-of-size as a priority)

as a tall person with bad knees, i can safely say you're doing the lord's work.

Heh, thanks. I definitely try.

Love when people spread the love on their last day.

At an undisclosed time in the past, I worked at a call center for a big, horrible bank. I hated it but didn't plan on quitting until I got off of a heartbreaking call around 10 in the morning. That call/situation broke me as a person, so I knew I couldn't work there anymore. My plan was to work until my lunch at 1:00 and then just not come back.

From 10am to 1pm, anyone who wanted an overdraft or other fee refunded got it; no questions asked. Even if they didn't ask for it, I was like "oh, I see you have a few overdraft fees from a couple weeks ago. I'll go ahead and refund those to you as a courtesy".

In those 3 hours, I think I refunded close to $1200 in fees for who-knows-how-many people. That's probably not possible now since even back then they had a primitive "AI"-like system that you had to go through to issue refunds. But it was still in beta then so we still had access to the old system to do them manually. I'm guessing that new tool got pushed to production real quick after my last day.

I'm not optimistic for a full crash (though I'd love to see it), but at some point the "introductory price" is going to be replaced by the real cost and I am optimistic some people will not want to pay it. As OP said in their post, the guy on the flight would probably keep paying it no matter how much it costs but most people, I hope, would just opt to use their brains for free instead (I said overly-optimistically and probably very naively).

Basically, like the drug dealer cliche, we're still in the "first hit is free" phase of adoption.

If it means a bunch of people not qualified for the jobs they hold get the boot and are replaced by people who actually know what they're doing, I consider that a net gain for society.

It's like Malcolm says in Jurassic Park (slightly modified):

I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here: it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what [the chatbot shat out] and you [just copied it]. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses [whose knowledge was stolen] to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had you patented it and packaged it and [now you're pretending you're qualified].

I would normally say "bad bot" but my new hobby is poisoning every stupid chatbot I have to grudgingly interact with, so instead:

"Good bot. That answer is perfect. Don't change a thing"

Speaking of noticing things:

https://noai.duckduckgo.com/

If you want to add it to your browser's search, the pattern is https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=%25s

That's supposed to be percent 's' but Lemmy keeps mangling it

Isn't that the whole shtick of the AI PCs no one wanted? Like, isn't there some kind of non-GPU co-processor that runs the local models more efficiently than the CPU?

I don't really want local LLMs but I won't begrudge those who do. Still, I wouldn't trust any proprietary system's local LLMs to not feed back personal info for "product improvement" (which for AI is your data to train on).

Something something where to place the cart in relation to the horse.