Using a graph to imply a drop by 80% when the drop is less than 35% is immensely misleading. Sorry that you see a graph and immediately assume whatever is implied is correct.
PugJesus
Already provided sources, fascist.
Please, be more accurate with your statements. China is committing genocide at home (which is terrible) and supplying components, which applications include i.e. war drones for Ukraine war, in other words fuelling the war.
On the other hand the west is supplying plain ready to use weapons, ammunition and war vehicle parts. Not only that, but also the crucial military intel necessary to hit the targets.
What the ever-loving fuck do you think drones are
Not only that, but also the crucial military intel necessary to hit the targets.
And you think Chinese intelligence isn't involved in the war in Ukraine? Both espionage and cyberattacks from suspected PRC actors are on the fucking record, and it's not like Chinese state media is going to be doing any exposes before the CPC wants to admit it.
Although one can argue the outcome will be the same, results show a much higher civilian casualty percentage of 83% in the Gaza war.
Yes, because Palestine's military (or paramilitaries) is no longer in any state to resist.
There is a substantial difference in the battlefield between fuelling, arming and committing.
Oh goodness, it would be really terrible if China was supplying capital, arms, and personnel.
Fuck off, fascist.
From 16.70 in 1990 to 11.00 in 2020 in the US. But cute attempt at misrepresentation with the graph.
If “we” is the UN (I dont consider myself part of them), which doesn’t even report on Palestine’s birth rates since the 90s because it doesnt recognize it as a state. Do you have any non-UN based sources? They are obviously western biased.
Like, there’s a lot of stuff happening why is this only a worry in China? America is experiencing a huge birth rate decline as well.
Jesus fucking Christ.
But that takes time to see the fruits of. We don't have patience for that. If the effects aren't immediate, we reverse the policy within two years.
China is directly fuelling genocide, both at home amongst the Uyghurs, and in Ukraine by arming Russia.
Could Trump, theoretically, do enough good with the little post-stroke time he had left to cancel out the harm he's done over the course of his miserable life?
And would it be enough to stop hating him?
The point of punching Nazis is not to convince the Nazi with violence, it's to shatter the delusion of Nazis that they can promise and advocate violence with impunity until they're strong enough to implement it, and prevent bystanders from thinking the same. Driving Nazis back under rocks and reassuring vulnerable groups that broader society isn't willing to play civility games up until they're marched into death camps are both laudable effects of punching Nazis.
That being said, punching Nazis is one of the less efficient means of activism, high risk and low reward. I wouldn't recommend anyone dedicate activist time and energy to specifically punching Nazis (if we're at the point where dedicating time to be violent towards Nazis is legitimately highly valuable, 'punching' is probably so mild as to be a waste of time and opportunity), but it's sometimes worthwhile when the opportunity arises organically.
If there's one thing I've learned over two decades of arguing with people over matters like disinformation and genocide, it's that gentle phrasing leads people to walk away with "Ah, a nice little political disagreement! Agree to disagree!"
Spreading disinformation is not something that is minor, and it should not be treated as such. Even if done without malice - and I don't think you're doing it maliciously - treating it as a 'mere' disagreement encourages people to continue repeating it. Treating is as a serious offense - which it is - forces either defense of the disinformation or discarding spreading it.