ageedizzle

joined 5 days ago
[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 45 minutes ago

Are there any lawyers in here that can tell us how likely this thing is to succeed?

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 48 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

At this point I say we should just cut our losses and just let that bridge sit unoccupied for now

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Can you give me the TL;DR? 

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

I agree with you completely

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah I think targeting income brackets is the way to go. It’s a more precise target. Because not everyone from a minority group is economically disenfranchised, though of course many are. So targeting income brackets would still have the effect of increasing diversity, but at the same time it would ensure that the individuals benefiting from these programs are those that need it most.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Interesting. And yeah I fid see that Claire Obscure Expedition 33 stuff actually haha.

Thank you for your perspective and your advice! I appreciate it.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Okay, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining 

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whats the distinction between the seizure versus the proceeds?

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thank you for the detailed response. Most opinions on this topic are very much so based on vibes rather than real experience, so it's interesting to hear an informed opinion from someone on the inside.

I hope to become a software developer one day too (it's a slow process, because I'm teaching myself in my free time) so I sometimes worry if all the effort I'm putting in is even worth it if LLMs will be doing all the programming in a few years. Do you think that's a concern? Will these tools continue to develop to that point or are they hitting a wall, like some people are saying?

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Wow, lasts 10+ years and has 3D capabilities. That sounds pretty good. What model is it? 

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Nor do I think they need an AGI to do this.

Yeah I guess theres a lot of interesting stuff we can do with AI without necessarily achieving AGI. What about programming? Even if we don't get AGI soon, do you still think LLMs will be snatching up a sizeable chunk of programming jobs? 

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Interesting. Stuff like this makes me suspicious of the current LLM hype. I know it’s not necessarily language models per se being used by these vehicles, but still. If we were really on the cusp of AGI then I’d expect us to have at least cracked autonomous driving by now. 

view more: next ›