They do not want to coexist. The existence of an 'other' is a threat/attack to them.
Read nazi philosopher carl schmitt or fiction novel 'blindsight'.
dansemacabreingalone
joined 2 weeks ago
Because a large part of many of these practices is the exclusion of all others. Thanks for sharing, though!
One might suggest a democracy of action/labor, where you do the things you feel like matter in the world in the ways you feel are best. 'If you care, do the work' in a broad sense.
It raises issues of ableism that need to be worked out, but its not like amy current systems dont fuck people, still encourages ambition, and makes things like amassing power more difficult.
Thats not democracy. Democracy is rule by the people.
You mean 'electoral representative democracy' which you describe accurately. Other kinds do exist.
Not that any of thrm are allowed or americans believe they exist.
Here are the arguments theyll be sure are winners:
1
says in old book. You not have old book.
2
DIE UNBELIEVER!
3
hello, morality officer? Yes, i have an unbeliever here.
Like everything here, yes.
Play them incomprehensible jazz prog and metal. The stuff only the music prodigy will even be able to identify as music.
I prefer to call it a 'mechanical failsafe'.
Tactical never-going-outside
Oh no! Action i didnt get to approve/disapprove! How terrible!
Go outside. Talk with random people on a train. Tell me this shit again.
So youre saying: if The Party cant help you, just suffer quietly until you die in terrible squalor?
Can... Can i get a tankie 'fuck you thats insane' for some left unity here?
Noted elsewhere. Differences will happen. Why make them discrete or sacred?