feral_sh

joined 1 day ago
[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -1 points 1 hour ago

This does a decent enough job of trying to explain my issue with the sample selection and process used:

https://lemmy.today/comment/26855969

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -2 points 1 hour ago

I can’t really find a direct large scale study, honestly we should fund one. I did find this though…

This isn’t a direct study but it kind of explains the issue I was trying to communicate, and it even references the other study that was linked here:

The Amsterdam cohort of gender dysphoria study

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

I’ll add a clarifier at the end but I didn’t specifically reference procedures, so I’ll probably leave the “like this” part unless that’s considered deceptive in some way?

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -1 points 1 hour ago

Oh, I’m not referring to a meta analysis… I actually avoid those because it’s a bit harder to verify all of the sample selection methods. I’m curious about direct, ongoing, large scale studies that may or may not have wrapped up.

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -2 points 1 hour ago

Thanks! It would work to your advantage to operate a bit friendlier though. How are we going to change the internet without some smiles?

I’ll take a look at the link. Personally, I just think it’s a bit harder to verify the sample integrity in aggregate studies, that’s all. I believe a good portion of the scientific community hold this belief as well, but it’s not my area of expertise.

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -3 points 1 hour ago

That’s fair, maybe I used the wrong words.

I think my experience can have something to do with their experience. I think a lot of the feelings I’ve felt are similar, although not the same.

I don’t think my experience is inherently unrelated, invalid, or dismissible because I’m not trans. If you still disagree I guess that’s alright, but that’s what I meant by opinion.

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -1 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

The study appears to be a meta analysis or aggregation, so it’s going to take me a bit longer to look into. If you have favorite non-aggregate studies you personally know of, please let me know too. I’m sure I’ll find some, but my searches might not lead me down the same path.

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Thanks but with respect, everyone’s personal opinion is valid. I appreciate your information and will read the article you linked.

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

That’s good to know, thank you. It makes the angle pretty different.

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Yeah, there’s definitely data supporting this. It’s good news for sure in the medical field.

I do wonder about sample sizes and selection bias, as the ones I found seem to be a bit small and targeted. I think I’m going to research some of the larger studies that might be ongoing right now to see how they’re coming along.

If I find anything useful, I’ll post it here!

view more: next ›