This isn't really accurate. I agree with your sentiment on some level... But the swastika has existed for thousands of years in many different forms in many different cultures. It was co opted for sure, but not really changed. I agree that it is predominantly used as a hate symbol in modern culture, but it's not quite as simple as you are putting it here, imho. Ancient Buddhist or Hindu temples shouldn't be torn down because of a madman that stole a symbol nonsensically that had nothing to do with Aryan superiority. Might be nice if someday it could be rehabbed but certainly today, in America especially it is generally used as only meaning one thing. Not trying to be pedantic, it's just not quite as cut and dry as you're representing.
itsgoodtobeawake
joined 2 years ago
It doesn't exist, how is that hard to admit for you? Freedom of speech is intended to protect exactly the kind of speech you disagree with, otherwise it's not a thing. "Largely free" = NOT FREE
You mean freedom of speech.... That's what you're saying is not an important value? The freedom to speak truth to power without the goon squad kicking down your door? Clearly that is being eroded in the US right now, but China certainly doesn't have it.
The devil is in the details?