jjjalljs

I remember a bunch of coworkers leaving during COVID and I was like "ok but what're you going to do after? It's fucking boring where you're moving to."

I’m a Republican

In 2025? Why on earth? No Republican policy is good. Their policies don't align with their marketing.

He's not even in office until January , so anyone sincerely saying that has an extra layer of idiocy.

Yeah if AI was actually good you wouldn't need to mandate it. No one was like "everyone here must use Google search".

On the one hand, omnipresent surveillance is bad and ripe for abuse.

On the other, I feel like the haphazard and selective enforcement of traffic laws by police officers is also really bad. Cops can selectively enforce laws so poor people or black people or whatever out-group suffers more. A machine should be impartial.

On the last hand, no traffic enforcement is probably going to get people killed. So that's not desirable.

Also, fines are problematic. Fines should probably scale with wealth, but also it shouldn't be a revenue source because that's a perverse incentive.

Companies fill up with idiots and parasites. People who are adept at thriving in the role without actually producing value. Google is no exception.

We've all read Pet Semetary, right?

Assuming what you're saying about the harms of consuming pornography, is it the state's responsibility? Is it a top priority? Do we trust conservatives to implement a solution in good faith?

The answer to all of those I think is no.

There's no analogous ID check for violent media, so far as I know.

There could be a raging wildfire and I would hesitate if a Republican said "let me deal with it". They are fundamentally untrustworthy.

That's on top of the deep irony of the same party that goes on about "small government" and "parents rights" is typically the same one pushing draconian anti-porn laws. It's a joke. "A government small enough to fit in your bedroom". Their motivations are so corrupt I am extremely skeptical of anything they propose.

I feel like I would have nullified, had I been on the jury.

It's do-gooder derogation. People get upset when they see someone else being more moral than them. Instead of trying to either grow themselves or accept their own imperfections, they lash out.

And some people just like being part of the in-group, and see vegans as an easy out-group to mock.

I've been pushing to add some basic checks on PR, and people are reluctant. There's one repo that I'm code owner on so I spent the like 15 minutes to apply a code formatter and add a GitHub action to check. But on the main repo people are dragging their heels. I'm like just pick ruff or black and do it. It's going to take like 10 minutes. I'm not asking for us to go crazy and add automated tests right now, but can we at least get something to verify the python code is syntactically correct?

The other day something went through code review until I looked at it and saw there was an extra (, and that shit wouldn't even run. I'm like please please add an automated check. I'll do it. Please.

I think a lot of people just aren't familiar with how other places do software. This is the same place that was ssh'ing into prod and making changes right on the machine until like this month.

I'm kind of bummed no one at my job really does code reviews seriously. I don't really get any feedback, so it's hard to improve.

That's also probably why the older code is an idiosyncratic mess of mutations and "oh yeah you need this config file that's not in source control " and "oh sorry I guess I hard coded that file path, huh?"