jtrek

The legislation seeks to amend existing immigration law to bar entry and naturalization, as well as create new grounds for deportation for anyone linked to what it describes as “totalitarian” parties, both foreign and domestic.

Trumpism is pretty "totalitarian". I wouldn't be that upset if all the magas got removed from power, and the irony of their own law being used to do it would be delicious.

That humor aside, this is a terrible idea that should be grounds for Roy's immediate removal from office.

My leading theory is there are many, many, people who are semi literate and don't realize. They think reading is just kind of uncomfortable and slow, and don't understand why anyone else would. Maybe they're reading each word out loud in their head, sounding some of them out. You wouldn't find a lot of people like that on a text based platform like this.

But for someone like that, an AI summary or video is probably a relief.

I took some dubious online reading speed tests the other day and it said like 350wpm, but the average is like half that.

Personally, I think the solution would be to invest in education, but there's no quarterly money in public good.

With a 9 prefix for organic!

Given the amount of people saying they don't want a stranger engaging with them in this thread, and the op describing it as liberating, you may be in the minority.

And it's not apathy really. It's more like... respect. If someone asks for help, that's different than just barging into their space.

The stagnating wages and fraying social bonds are problems, though.

Google also making search worse so people will use their slop machine instead

In my experience in New York City, people will generally ignore you, except (usually) when there's a real emergency.

Someone crying? No big deal. Let them cry.

Saw a lady trip and fall down the stairs in the subway, and a bunch of people ran over to help her and return the stuff she dropped.

Yep. Infrastructure shouldn't be privately owned.

Yes that is the legal justification. I am not interested in the legal justification. Laws are not inherently good. They were clearly paid less than their worth if there's six figure payouts to be had here.

This is the fundamental injustice of capitalism. The owner pays you a small amount and keeps all the profits. A child would recognize that as unfair.

This feels like theft. Maybe not technically legally but the people who did the chatting aren't getting the money. Capitalist hellscape

Parents raised their own alarms, with several pointing to the political division Kirk's presence would inevitably import onto campus

Peeve: it's not the division that's the problem. It's the hate and lies.

There's also the class of comments that explain strange business decisions.

# Product guy said to return January 1st if the user doesn't have a birthday on record

Kind of arbitrary but someone with decision making power decreed it.

It's because leadership is a heady cocktail of stupid and selfish.

I really want to stress stupid. That means they draw bad conclusions from facts.

Sometimes selfish is a factor. They have an obscure reason like "my share value goes up because we get a kickback from the city for staffing an office here". They don't care if it's bad for everyone else or the company long term. They'll get their money and then leave.