If I own a human slave, me artificially inseminating them without consent isn't rape?
If I DNA test the slave from earlier and discover they aren't human, inseminating them without consent wouldn't be rape?
lalo
joined 2 years ago
What do we call a sexual act with a being that did not consent?
Does it matter if the being is human? And what if the being is a neanderthal?
Or say we find a lady on the street and DNA test her, find out she's technically not human. What would we call sexually acting upon her without her consent?
If defining this action triggers you emotionally this much, that's a reflection of your ability to have level-headed conversations. It's not your interlocutor as much as you'd like to claim.
Can we get a peek? Sounds juicy
It's not like vegans wants animals inside them. Or that they financially support fisting cows like in OP's picture.
Her job was fisting the dog, filming and publishing it online.
Say Alice fists a dog and films it, let's say she derived no pleasure from fisting the dog, just wanted to get her job done. But she then posts the video online for many others to derive pleasure from it. Did she commit bestiality?
If someone likes doing it because their arm feels good inside the cow's anus, fisting a cow wouldn't be bestiality?
I don’t think artificial insemination of livestock falls into the category of bestiality.
If the perpetrator of the act (or the beneficiaries from the act) derives pleasure from it, isn't it bestiality?
isn’t all sex between any two non-human animals rape?
Non-human animals aren't moral agents and can't be subjected to the same moral outcomes that humans have. The same way we can't say a hurricane has done something immoral.
Non-human animals are moral patients. When moral agents act immorally upon moral patients, the agents are responsible.
Hell yeah! Morals are just a suggestion, lions eat their young, but I can't? That's bullshit and we all know it. If you wanna argue against eating our young (just the disabled ones, of course), please keep that melodramatic stuff out of here.
The same process is done to cows that will be slaughtered to meat, otherwise the farmers wouldn't be able to selectively breed and would be risky to the cows (cows have a high risk of injury when getting mounted by a bull). Farmers find a bull with the desired fenotype, buy his semen and impregnate the cows in the same manner you see pictured by OP.
"Feels good" is not a valid justification to harm others, imagine how that justification would apply in other cases and it's pretty easy to see how it falls apart. You can't be logically consistent with that justification to harm others. The same with apathy, also not a justification to needlessly exploit animals.