And CharGPT is under the same legal obligation to tattle if it correctly identifies that is your intention. If it can't reliably determine your intentions, then how is it a good therapist?
zbyte64
Ehh, most people are not that tech literate. Combine that with on demand sycophant as a service and it's a match made in hell.
Have you ever tried sleeping on gold bars and cash? It's not easy...
These people definitely are not dragons.
He goes on fox news and says he didn't lie and that the judge lied about his admission. Crazy.
Fair point. I wanted to call out how voters asking for better candidates is not voter apathy. Not that people who are apathetic to democracy don't need to be challenged.
I'm talking about this bill in particular:
https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/10/school-antisemitism-bill-signed/
Then later he gets asked about the AIPAC money he receives and he responds "well that's interesting you ask that" as if the question itself is antisemitic. https://youtu.be/SB-C6QeNyHw
listen to him talk about the students that have been protesting the genocide, he casts it as antisemitic.
It's strange to me that we're agitating for voters to change and not our leaders. It's fewer people you have to convince.
If she wins the primary then all bets are off. That would mean she ran enough of a good campaign that big money didn't matter.
The trans issue shows he's not up for the challenge. If he can't stay on message and has to spread disinformation to win then he is only going to sweep MAGA under the rug instead of addressing their lies head on.
Everyone responding "at least he isn't as bad as that other corporate Democrat" is just sad.
Only if video games were mindlessly created by AI without any obligations to the law. Actually, that would make a good short story....