To be clear, the punishment wasn't him loosing 2B, he wouldn't even notice the difference. The punishment was being told he was wrong by a jury of his "peers".
zbyte64
joined 2 years ago
If you don't even debate whether there should have been a primary after a statement like that then okay, let's say you're right about voters, then what? How does this lesson inform your actions going forward?
Because at least with my perspective the goal is to get better leadership to win more voters over. With your perspective what are we doing exactly? Lecturing voters? Waiting for more faces to be eaten?
You are right that is how voters act, to expect otherwise is to excuse leadership that refuses to grapple with that reality.
The main thing is that you know better then the consultants the Democrats hired who said it would be okay. Does that make their leadership sound any more capable?
Let's be real, you had to be bad at your job to loose that race. It's pathetic we're making excuses for our "leaders" when they led us down this path for so long. Still would vote for her again though .
Yes, so you should ask for a big discount.
Or dispose of evidence.
Let's also not forget all the broken campaign finance election laws that preceded his win. No accountability followed because the winner keeps the spoils
True but a person calling it art says more about them then the non-existent artist.
People with less privilege do.
I wonder if you could prompt inject with QR codes...
Technically it is open if you're paying in Chinese Yuan 😂