this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
742 points (98.9% liked)

Political Memes

9413 readers
4449 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (5 children)

Duckduckgo's AI search seems to slightly agree with you, meaning Futurism and Engadget:

Grok, the AI chatbot, initially spread misinformation about Charlie Kirk's death by claiming he survived the shooting and that videos of the incident were fake. This confusion stemmed from the chatbot's inability to accurately process breaking news and conflicting information, leading to a series of incorrect statements before eventually acknowledging Kirk's death.

That means AI really, really sucks and can be manipulated easily.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

So... just like people?

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

I think it's well known at this point that grok in particular has been designed to be easy to manipulate by deliberately keeping it in the dark and feeding it only select information so that Musk can make it say what he wants.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 26 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Kinda ironic that you posted a quote from Duckduckgo’s AI to make a point that AI sucks and is easy to manipulate.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Our entire future of internet use from now until the next major technological upheaval is going to consist ENTIRELY of going between different shitty AI models to try to get enough coherent answers that we can possibly, maybe figure out some shred of truth.

While the vast bulk of humanity just accepts whatever their most convenient chat model tells them.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

My fear is most will forget what truth looks like during this stage, and how to look for it, such that there won't really be a next stage. Those of us who do remember will be pushed to the margins and hunted, or driven mad.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I guess you didn't understand the nuance. Duckduckgo was requoting Engadget and Futurism. It's a loop of information that is controlled by media outlets chosen by the person running the bot.

[–] BenevolentOne@infosec.pub 2 points 10 hours ago

This has been the case since it was possible to pay someone to run from village to village shouting things... It's just more now.

Welcome to the party, beers over there.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 13 hours ago

Yes, LLMs, or what people call AI, are absolutely manipulated easily. Just the way you phrase your question can steer it to answer in a particular way. I haven't been on Twitter in a long time, but I hopped on yesterday and today to check out all of the Kirk memes.

I saw so many comments from people both happy and upset with Kirk dying, that were asking questions in manipulative ways (to the llm) to try and get the response from grok they want.

LLMs are indeed horrible for live or recent events, and more importantly horrible for anything that is super important to not get wrong.

Don't get me wrong I personally find llms useful and I use open source models occasionally for tasks they are better at, for me typically that means reformatting or compiling shorter notes from documents. Nothing super critical.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 13 hours ago

ddg doesn't run it's own llm, they're just a frontend to chatgpt that (allegedly) strips out all the tracking.