politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
True. Side effect is probably that the usa sinks faster with each good person leaving. Still it's hard to blame them for leaving.
How else do we get to Idiocracy faster?
I'm doing my part!
They get what they voted for.
I'm so sick of reading this type of comment. Trump got 49.8% of the vote. That means Harris and 3rd party voters combined were a majority of voters. And so many people are disenfranchised here for BS reasons that I'm sure Trump would have lost if all the people who wanted to vote were able to.
I understand why foreigners would have a lot of hate for America, but please try to focus that hate on our elites, who set the rules for our sham democracy, propagandize the shit out of us via ownership of most of our media, and are responsible for our Imperialist crimes.
The average American gets virtually no say in what our government does to us or to the rest of the world.
That in itself is an harrowing statistic.
"Math is hard", eh? 🤌🏼
"If you count third party candidates who have absolutely no hope of winning, it turns out that Trump didn't win the popular vote in 2024. Sure, more people voted for him than voted for the perfectly normal democratic candidate, but if you add her votes to the votes for the Green party candidate, the Libertarian Party candidate, the Socialism and Liberation party candidate, and RFK Jr. Combined, they all got very slightly more votes than Trump. So, America isn't cooked."
No, it's only very slightly almost cooked. Nice.
I guess murican politics are fucked up (no news there), otherwise maybe the barely majority could've banded up and formed a government. Happened in Portugal a while back when the right was elected but had a minority, so the left got together and formed government instead.
This pretends that Harris wasn't a ghoul as well. See Gaza, immigration, militarism, etc.
America is a one party state, and in their typical extravagance, has two of them.
There are no institutional mechanisms in American politics to make that happen. We don't have a parliamentary system. (I wish we did).
Agreed
"The Epstein Class"
Not to mention that these "elites" don't respect borders, so properly identifying them as the issue and fixing it so they lose power/influence in your country, could have cascade effects, even in the originating country.
Because if you think America is isolated in our shitty politics, every other citizen from other countries are going to have a rude awakening when the technocrats/oligarchs have ruined or grow bored of the US and move on to ruin your country (see Venezuela, Palestine, or any country that signed a free trade agreement with us that are now getting hit with tariffs).
Their class solidarity is international, and so must ours be.
Also Georgia found evidence that musk rigged it.
63% of US population voted. Less than half of that group voted for Harris. That means at least 68.5% (but really more) either did not vote for Harris to mitigate the risk of Trump or actively choose to vote for him.
Fuck them all. 31.5% of the population is worth a shit. And even then some of them are anti-socialist libs.... so I don't even like all of them either.
68% of registered voters voted for Trump.
https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1k1dvv3/oc_us_presidential_election_results_as_percentage/
Stick to nursery rhymes, kiddo.
I assume you're counting the non votes as votes for Trump. Disingenuous at best.
Unless we're criticizing third party voters, of course.
It's absolutely not disingenuous. It's what happened.
Yep, since that's what they were.
Real quick. Quantify for me (since you seem to have a link for everything) how many of those people who didn't vote but were eligible lived in places where their district was gerrymandered to hell? Or where they live the state had engineered it to be impossible to vote (limiting voting locations (making sure the lines would be astronomical and the weather would do the work for them), preventing people from bussing people to voting offices. Limiting or completely removing the ability to vote by mail. I'll wait.
🦗🦗🦗🎶
Well...yes and no. If I recall well, little over 60% voted. Slightly more than half for trump. So a bit over 30% of the american voters voted for this shit. Those 40% that not voted.... They could have made a difference but did not bother
I have ~~a friend~~... A person I know, who is dating a good friend of mine. He's from California originally. He convinced my friend to not vote because Kamala had "bad policies" when she was an AG. Blah blah pot. Blah blah guns.. blah blah excuse.
Now he's vocal about Trump's policies, blah blah guns. Blah blah free speech, blah blah ICE.
I'm like mofo do you even hear yourself? She wasn't perfect. She made mistakes... But nope couldn't vote for the woman.
Shits infuriating.
It's perfectly legitimate to vote third party in a non-swing state to express your disgust with the state of The Democrats. However, doing that in a swing state is basically just punching yourself in the face.
In no case should you choose not to vote because that registers as apathy rather than disgust with the choices.
So they both voted for Trump. There's no debate. That's what happened.
A lot of people wanted to vote but couldn’t because they were purged off of voter rolls.
Slightly less than half
Nope. Less than half voted for Trump. He didn't even have a majority of people who cast a vote for president. And a third of the country isn't eligible to vote due to age.
So just under 20% of Americans voted for him.
The 40% that didn't vote would probably have also broke 50/50 for Trump vs. Harris if they'd bothered to vote. But, most of them probably live in states like Massachusetts or Wyoming where one party's lead is so huge that their vote really wouldn't have had any effect.
Stop deflecting and trying to blame non-voters when the real problem is the people who voted for Trump.
Every abstained vote is a vote for trump, so 68% of the country voted for Trump.
Asinine reasoning. If Harris had won, they'd all have been a vote for her.
But they didn't, and she didn't, so they weren't.
No, if literal Hitler is running in the election and you don't vote, the vote counts for Hitler.
Trust me when I say I have wrestled with this for a long time now, having to live among people who either voted for the fascists or didn't vote at all. There are a few key factors in the US that just don't make it that simple:
If you go from abstaining to voting for Trump, then you've voted twice!
They voted as a country. The country as an entity wanted Trump and it got him.
Only the losers in any election starts itemizing. I get it: Trump is about as legit as Hitler in terms of absolute percentage of people who voted for him vs. the entire pool of potential electors.
But that's not how it works: he won as per the rules of the elections, and now he's become the country's choice and its problem.
Fitting username.
To add: we've been voting on how our elections work since 2000. The problem was obvious then and we kept excusing candidates who support FPTP.