this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
111 points (91.7% liked)

politics

28977 readers
2839 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrMartinu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 102 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I appreciate Fetterman for always illustrating the brain damaged point of view.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The brain damage hasn't helped, but Fetterman has always been a conservative cosplaying as a working class union guy. His father is the CEO of an insurance agency, a big Republican donor, and he bankrolled Fettermans political career.

If you actually look into his history in government his behavior has been very consistent throughout his career. Pretty much anyone who works with him will always report that he's an erasable contrarian and is very lazy. Even as Lt gov he barely showed up to preside over the state Senate which was mandatory, and his official schedule was empty 1/3 of the time. Even when he did decide to work, he averaged a 4-5 hour day.

I keep trying to tell people that while brain damage can alter a personality, it usually does so by removing prior inhibitions or damaging memory, reasoning, and emotional regulation. The core personality traits rarely change this drastically.

He was always this evil. He just has a harder time hiding it now.

[–] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't figure out what "erasable" means in this context.

...Maybe it was supposed to be "irascible," and got autocorrected?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I pronounce them basically the same, could be speech to text.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I knew he was a piece of shit from the start when he supported fracking and denied the harms of it, in PA no less.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 points 21 hours ago

It was always weird to me that people online were acting like the fact that he couldn't be bothered to dress like an adult was somehow a really awesome demonstration of how great a politician they were going to be.