this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
1330 points (90.9% liked)

Political Memes

11461 readers
1530 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Republicans also really love when you vote third party.

(Or Democrat party too, depending on where the votes are being taken from)

Until enough people do, and sufficient votes are taken from the purple party, that they lose.

... But then, may also need to mend all the lobbying, gerymandering, voter suppression, rigged voting machines, electoral college, etc first/simultaneously.

Imagine if the people in USA got a system that helped them vote for what they want, not against who they don't want. Imagine... :)

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Until enough people do, and sufficient votes are taken from the purple party, that they lose.

Nope, you utterly miss the point. First past the post means that Republicans win when the anti-fascist vote is split.

If you don't like the current candidates of the Democrat party, then go vote in the Democrat primary.

Imagine if the people in USA got a system that helped them vote for what they want, not against who they don’t want. Imagine… :)

There is this little thing called "objective reality". First past the post sucks, but it is objective reality. You should try taking it into account, some time.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 4 points 2 days ago

Nope. Did not miss your point at all. You seemed to miss mine, and doubled down.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

one week old account shilling for a political party

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I remember when Gore lost Florida, and therefore the country, because less than one tenth of one percent of voters thought a protest vote for Nader was a good idea. In primaries and in smaller elections, sure, give third party votes a try. But the bigger the election, the more it converges on a choice between the two major parties, and one of them is worse than the other.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

gore won that election. the supreme Court stole it.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The Republicans would never have been able to steal it, if third party votes had not made it close.

If everybody who voted Nader had voted for Gore instead, there would have been no wiggle room for the Supreme Court to butt in. And every Nader voter who was not an idiot know from the polls that Nader would not win.

With Gore instead of Bush, there would have been no Iraq War, for one thing. And the US would have taken climate change seriously.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 2 days ago

" And every Nader voter who was not an idiot know from the polls that Nader would not win."

future knowledge is an impossibility

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 2 days ago

"With Gore instead of Bush, there would have been no Iraq War, for one thing"

this can't be proven, either

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 2 days ago

"If everybody who voted Nader had voted for Gore instead, there would have been no wiggle room for the Supreme Court to butt in."

this can't be proven

[–] starik@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Using “Democrat” as an adjective is usually an indicator of someone who mostly consumes right wing media.

This thread is full of commenters trying to convince people not to vote (for good lefty reasons, of course!)

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well rest assured, I advocate voting, and warn against doing a "no-vote" as that's equivalent to a vote for "any tyrant will do".

And I doubt I consume much "right wing media" at all. ... Not sure I used the term as an adjective either... and so that whole line kinda threw me. Multiple ways invalid and unsound.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Democrat Party (epithet)

It’s “Democratic party.” Democratic is the adjective modifying the noun party.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 39 minutes ago

Oh, thanks. Still sounds wrong. Mislead either way.