cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16451158
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
1328 points (90.9% liked)
Political Memes
11461 readers
1807 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Good thing Trump ended the genocide!
Anything to not have to grapple with the idea that just voting blue is not enough, huh? And are we going to pretend that Biden didn't gleeflully pour billions into the genocide?
Yes, don't vote at all. Better to have more genocide but having the moral high ground of not having voted for less.
Is it really that uncomfortable to engage with the idea? This is just an online forum, there is no possible negative consequence to whatever you write. Humor me, try to refute the idea that voting for a politician purely based on the actions of their opponent disincentivizes the politician to do anything for your benefit. Note that I'm not mentioning genocide, morality, blue, green, red or yellow or whatever. As far as I'm concerned this is about a fictional country called Fakeland with two parties.
If you guarantee your vote to a politician, what incentive do they have to give even a single shit about your standards of living?
How do you guarantee a vote? It's not like you're telling the politician ahead of time.
You can't really say you're against genocide if you knowingly take no action against the candidate that says he wants to glass Gaza so he can build a nice resort there.
I know. It's like his opponents threw it away when they didn't firmly denounce the genocide.
Trump won by promising a greater genocide. Harris said she would do everything to stop it but not stop weapons.
Americans voted for the bigger genocide.
well thats just patently false.
Trump promised to genocide Palestines. In the debate he said he would support Israel more than Harris.
https://truthout.org/articles/trump-encourages-genocide-against-palestinians-saying-finish-the-problem/
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/donald-trump-middle-east-foreign-policy
https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/PoliticalStudies/Pages/trump-plans-for-ethnic-cleansing-in-gaza.aspx
America chose the candidate that supported genocide over Harris who was against it but said she wouldn't stop military aid.
Actually he managed to position himself as the peace candidate because Harris kept saying things like "I will ensure America has the most lethal fighting force in the world".
Trump promised to increase military spending with a trillion dollar military package. Again Harris didn't promise to be warlike enough.