this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
987 points (93.3% liked)
Political Memes
11475 readers
2891 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel like people don't think half a step ahead.
The children that these parents are taking care of, will probably grow up and work. Their work will allow our retirement. People without children just don't provide the same utility to the society.
We need "young people" and if we are unwilling to invest in that, we won't have them. And then we all moan about lack of social safe nets and pension safety.
Billionaires are the problem, not the people. There's plenty of money and resources for everyone, just that they are all concentrated in the 1% of the population.
I pay more in taxes in percentage than those billionaires, why shouldn't my taxes be enough to cover my retirement?
Is it because someone decided to give tax cuts to billionaires and now there's a hole in the budget?
Billionaires are the problem and we need children for e.g. pensions.
The labour needs to be done.
People without children aren't the problem, or the enemy. But they can't expect the same treatment as people with children. As people with children provide more to society.
Again, no. Most people produce more value than they need to last their lifetime, but most of that is stolen by billionaires.
We need a fair society and we wouldn't don't need children to pay for old folks' pensions. We already produce way more than we can consume in a single lifetime.
Agree, the children's utility to society isn't about money. It's about having doctors and firemen and farmers and artists. Idc how much money you have, if the next generation is smaller, who will be the CNAs in the retirement home where the childless (and others) are spending their pensions?
You aren't listening. The labour needs to be done. Who cares about money? When you are 80 yrs old, who will be your doctor? Who will work the fields for your food? Who will provide you any services? Any products? Anything?
You will need young people and they don't come from nowhere.
It's a prisoners dilemma. The employer who accommodates parents won't reap the benefit themselves.
That is why it shouldn't be up to the employer. It is called rights.
At the rate prices are going up I'll never be able to retire. So, fuck those kids.