this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
968 points (93.2% liked)

Political Memes

11475 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If offering the same flexibility to everybody is viable: yes. sure. don't restrict people just for shits and giggles.

But some businesses need people to be available at all times, and those businesses can handle letting some of their staff take time off on short notice or work during very specific hours only, but they can not handle giving the same consideration to everybody.

In those cases, preferential treatment for those who need it most is the right choice imo.

(Just abolishing work is, at this point in time, not viable.)

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

that's just a management skill issue

your claim requires an agreement that staffing at appropriate levels cannot be done for some reason