this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
1034 points (92.5% liked)

Political Memes

11943 readers
2046 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think people fail to understand what it means to work in America. Y’all Europeans really have no clue how bad we have it. If your job is accommodating you because you have kids and someone else complains, your company doesn’t accommodate both. They cancel your accommodation because of “fairness”. There is no ADA accommodation for kids.

The fact they agreed to it in the first place is a miracle. So yes people with no kids need to stfu. You already winning by keeping your money and more free time. Let parents have this one thing.

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 9 points 2 months ago

The problem isn’t the people without kids who complain, the problem is the company taking the flexibility away from everyone and being greedy

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why do I have to subsidize your weak pull-out game?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don’t. Just do your job and don’t worry what other people have going on.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But it is my business. My taxes subsidize people who don’t seem to care what effect their actions have on me or the world.

Housing prices are skyrocketing due to overpopulation (among other factors).

Climate change. Access to water, made worse by both more people and the climate change the engender.

Who are you to tell me it’s none of my business?

https://phys.org/news/2026-03-global-human-population-earth.html

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because the continuation of society requires children.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We are massively overpopulated already.

Those who choose not to have kids are Making room already in all the pediatric and child services they will never use.

Those with kids benefit when those without kids get the same treatment.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We're not overpopulated, we're bad at resource dispersal because we've built our society to reward greed and individualism.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's no different line of reasoning if you said billionaires don't have too much money they are just bad a resource dispersal because we've built our society to reward greed and individualism. Which I wholly reject as well.

You aren't wrong that we need to fix a lot of things such as our management or resources and waste products, and that greed and individualism are things we need to curtail, but just from water and food production going into the climate change we already have experienced, the global population is much worse off than it would be if we worked to reduce the global population by at least 1/3rd. (Under about 6.5 billion a d 4.9 being maximally ideal iirc)

That's just how the data wizards worked things out. That number is not a static number either. If magically we woke up tomorrow and all of the systemic problems were suddenly functioning in the best possible technical capability we have right now, the global population could support about 18-20 billion if they were spread out maximally.

But that's just not the reality we live in. We have so much waste both in usable things like food waste, and garbage from end of the line material(mostly plastic

That's the conclusion I've arrived at after looking into this topic multiple multiple times. (I started looking at it seriously when countries began pulling out of the Kyoto Accords) I could be mistaken about some of the information I hold to be true, and if I am I will need to readjust my perspective on this, but I'm not going to do that with you. I dont have the patience or grace to argue with people who want to ignore reality.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

People are destroying the planet and causing others to suffer. Having more than one kid is negligence.

And I’m not particularly impressed with “society” at the moment, so stop doing me “favors.”

But thank you for your “service” in “saving” civilization. 🫡

https://phys.org/news/2026-03-global-human-population-earth.html

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you don't like living in society you're welcome to leave, and the people destroying the planet are a cabal of wealthy overlords not the average working family.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I am? Okay where can I go that has no society? How do I get there? Am I allowed to be there?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But you are.

The rich do far more damage individually. But certainly the one simple thing everyone can do to make the world a better place is to have fewer children.