politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
So he didn’t specify bleach as the disinfectant of choice. He definitely suggested that injecting disinfectant would be a possible solution. I agree, and he should go first.
Yeah, see? He never said bleach! He might have meant Lysol, or Hydrogen Peroxide, or Vinegar, or Formula 409, or something, you don't know!
All of which are totally a-ok to inject and is a medically valid suggestion! /s
LOL the absolute narcissism to think you can solve this problem on a whim with absolutely no medical knowledge, or really any knowledge of any kind... Its peak Trump.
Again, the concept of using an injected antiviral was given to him by Stanford, and that's how he understood it as a typical American who has no level of STEM. Stanford was on a mission to remove lockdowns on behalf of their donors.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-inject-bleach-covid-19/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-bleach-covid-19/
I get the hate for Trump, but you guys are no better then MAGA playing mailman.
No, JD Vance did not actually fuck a couch.
Trump didn't make the leap to directly say to do that, but he did clearly think that strong lights and disinfectant in the body 'should be looked into'. He was saved from directly making a terrible recommendation by having some amount of deference for the medical organizations, but did try to show 'thought leadership' in a very dumb direction.
It was not some sort of Stanford spinning up wild concepts, it was Trump taking very obvious things about how we handle these things outside the body and thinking that we would be the first to ask 'but what about inside the body?'. Yes, he phrased it as a question to be looked into, but he clearly thought there could be something to it.
About the only credit you can give to first term Trump in this scenario is that he at least ultimately left health issues up to the health departments, even as he groused the whole time.
I mean, I quoted where he literally said that.
Yes, one can give him the benefit of the doubt as he is a fucking idiot. But fuck that, he’s in a position where the words he says are taken at face value and will and have killed people.
Even if his heart were in the right place and he were merely stupid, there is no reason to defend this shit.
So your Snopes link splits female arm hairs, admits it with a quote, then says the assertion is wrong, after demonstrating it's right. Laughing out loud.
I don't understand how you think that's a defense of any kind.