this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
47 points (100.0% liked)
memes
22674 readers
3382 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Unlike Microslop Outlook, there's a program that doesn't break when you lose internet connection.
The asshats for some reason felt that they needed to reinvent it as basically a web app and it’s broken in so many ways, and I think it’s lost feature parity with mobile and Mac instead of gaining. Sheer incompetence.
Can't wait for the day Satya Nadella gets fired, hopefully it will happen when the AI bubble bursts
He's going to keep all his wealth and maybe stroll into a high paying "consulting" gig. It's unfair. it's unjust. People who are bad at their jobs and making the world worse do not deserve immense wealth and comfort.
It's incredibly frustrating. I'm starting to think the only way out of poverty is immense crime.
If you choose that route, make sure it's immense enough that you'll never be prosecuted for it.
The way I see it: Corporate web apps (like Microsoft's) are evidence that the maker is putting administrative concerns ahead of user experience concerns. They're catering to the people who actually pay for this stuff, not to the users.
I switched to linux a bit over a year ago but had around a decade of feeling like MS and I disagreed about whose computer it was before that. MS has given me many "why the fuck would you do it like this!?" moments.
It's so much nicer using an OS where when something doesn't yet work as I want it to, I don't assume "because the people who made it are greedy assholes" is the reason for it.
Though I'd argue that they aren't just catering to those who pay for it, but also to themselves and various metrics and revenues they want. Like disabling autosave if you aren't saving to onedrive wasn't likely from any corporation other than MS itself.
Don't you kinda need internet for an email app?
No, given that one of the points of Outlook (and most email apps) is to store a local archive that can be read even when offline.
I found the most useful Outlook was '97. Just did everything I needed. Wasn't overly technical. No AI!
No encryption, probably running SMTP, no spoofing prevention, no compatibility with modern protocols, could it even handle files bigger than 2Mb?
But did we need all that back then?
Email is older than the internet.
Anyway, no, you don't need internet for the modern version we have today either. You only need it for a few moments.
Some people are being a bit pedantic about not technically needing the internet for email, and that's true, but the pedantry is hiding the fact that actually email is really cool in how it exists in whatever form we want it to be in! It can be transmitted over internet, or over bare TCP/IP, or even peer-to-peer. Most applications don't take advantage of how versatile email really is.
Of course, Micro$oft makes it rely on an always-on internet connection because it's better for their bottom line.
IPoAC is my personal favorite