this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
673 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

84110 readers
3058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't. I just can't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

There’s absolutely nothing in the specifications about contacting police or keeping black-box recordings. The only outside contact functionality was EMS contact when the vehicle had to pull over to the side of the road due to unconsciousness and detected other signs of a health emergency. Even that had loud audible warnings and a countdown timer before dialing.

If shitty governments take something that would save tens of thousands of lives globally every year and turn it into a surveillance system that’s the fault of those governments. The manufacturers entire focus has been on reducing fatalities and injuries among road users.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

I guess whatever you need to tell yourself..

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

What much of it comes down to is trust.

Can we trust that these systems will legitimately be used to improve public safety and not as a backdoor by the government to exert greater control? The skepticism is not unfounded.

It's the voters responsibility to elect governments that use such systems exclusively for public safety.

The behaviour of the government is a reflection of the voting public.

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

As is often the case, the EU has placed appropriate guardrails on driver monitoring systems, which the US and others would do well to follow;

Driver drowsiness and attention warning and advanced driver distraction warning systems shall be designed in such a way that those systems do not continuously record nor retain any data other than what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they were collected or otherwise processed within the closed-loop system. Furthermore, those data shall not be accessible or made available to third parties at any time and shall be immediately deleted after processing. Those systems shall also be designed to avoid overlap and shall not prompt the driver separately and concurrently or in a confusing manner where one action triggers both systems.