this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
657 points (95.7% liked)
Microblog Memes
11420 readers
2045 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The thing that this person seems to have either forgotten, or not understood in the first place, is that homework, and your education in general, is not for the teacher, it's for you. If you choose to cheat your way through you will gain less than if you actually put the work in yourself. This gets more important the further through education you go.
Probably the best outcome for an essay question is if you discuss it with your friends, all share your understanding of the subject, then write it up individually, incorporating anything new you learned from your discussions.
This does come with the issue that those who cheat could end up getting good grades if there is no 'live' check of their understanding, either through closed book exams, class tests, group discussions, or similar.
When I am struggling with Language Arts and excelling at Math, the extra time spent on unmastered Language homework benefits me. The extra time spent on Math serves only to waste my time and distract me from the Language work that needs my central focus.
The intention of homework is to benefit the student. The reality is that most students would be best served by skipping the homework and getting some exercise instead.
In the gradebook, the unit test score should be the floor for all homework scores in that unit. Score a 95% on the test, and even if you turn in zero homework, a 95% should be recorded for each assignment. S
Turn in 95% on each and every homework assignment, but score a 65% on the test? You keep your 95% scores showing you put in the work, even though you clearly haven't mastered the material.
Turn in no homework, and score a 65% on the test? Every homework assignment is now a 65%.
With this system, doing the homework can only help you. Skipping the homework is risky, but allowable.
That's mostly how the math department at my uni did things. Though a high-scoring final would only bring you up by 10% overall.
Indeed, it's not that LLM is totally uncorrelated to factual basis, it is correlated well enough for most educational fodder that is supremely well trodden and doesn't seek surprises. It's practice with backgrounds the teachers can actually already know and credibly provide feedback on. It's so well known that any teacher knows, so it's correlated with AI output that has been trained on verbatim prompts and essays that are on the exact same topic, and so the narrative correlated with the prompt is just very likely to also correlate to the facts of relevance.
Just like a pocket calculator can make short work of elementary school math. It's not that we expect those kids to do some crazy novel stuff that calculators can't do, it's just that they need to operate in a context to actually illustrate they have the foundational understanding.
Most teachers don’t understand that
As I see it, teachers should make sure that students know the purposed of homework and how it is supposed to help them learn, and then homework should just be optional to complete, though for the psychological effect homework completion should checked and lauded and people should get feedback on it.
Mind you, this only really makes sense for students old enough to actually understand an explanation of the purpose of homework and how it helps learning.
Depends, with homework, the goal is to learn, but with tests, it's already less clear, a good teacher needs to know the level of it's class in order to curate it's teaching to their understanding. Moreover, some formation recruit based on grades and in this context, the point op is making is very relevant
You were so close. Right up until you mentioned closed book exams. How many times in your job have you ever not been allowed to look something up? The reality is that closed book exams only test your memorization capabilities and some of us don’t memorize shit very well. The best teachers allow open book exams because if you know where the information is then you can find it in time but if you don’t know where the information is you’re not gonna be able to take the test in the time given.
I’m a language teacher. It happens all the time that I want to say something and can’t look it up. Think about the last time you were in a group of six or more people: the conversation doesn’t stay on one topic long enough to look up a word before responding to someone’s comment. I also wouldn’t want to take a moment to double check a word and hold up the whole line when the cashier at the grocery store asks me a question.
I think that situation is going to entirely depend on your friends. But your point is taken, however I still feel like you’re describing the same paradigm I was in which you know enough about your subject to look up the word if you wanted to or needed to but you don’t need to because you know enough about your subject to say other words that mean the same thing. My point was that it’s more important to know how to find the information than it is to simply have the information. Just being given the information is literally vibecoding.
Oh yeah, circumlocution (using other words to describe a concept without naming it) and the ability to infer meaning from root words and context are the goals, but the best way to train them is to put students in situations where they can’t look words up and have to use the knowledge they have. I’m perfectly happy to have them play taboo, but none of my classes have been that into taboo, sadly. Having them give presentations and respond to questions on the spot also works, but they hate that (I get it). That basically leaves me with tests and closed-book assignments unless I want to spend valuable class time individually interviewing each student. I don’t mind doing mostly assignments, but then the students tend to take the “closed-book” aspect much less seriously than they do for tests.
They encounter these situations in their daily lives, but that’s only good motivation for some of them. Some people withdraw into cultural enclaves and try to avoid the language spoken here when they encounter situations where they can’t communicate instead, and they need the training wheels of the classroom environment to get comfortable with and learn how to handle not knowing something.
It's rare, but not unheard of, that I can't look things up, but the point of closed book exams is is to demonstrate that you know the subject well enough that you don't need to look things up. Obviously, exactly what this entails is going to vary depending on the level if the exam. If it's testing foundational knowledge, then it should all be in your head, if it's more advanced, a crib sheet with key facts (say certain more complex, but necessary, equations for a non maths subject, or similar support prompts).
If you're working, you can't be stopping every few minutes to look up basic information. A computer programmer who has to keep looking up the syntax of their language, or basic algorithms, for example, won't get very far.
The algorithms one in particular is a bugbear of mine, because if you don’t already know the computational complexities of the operations on the common basic data structures then no way are you taking the time to look them all up each and every time you declare one. And yet one of the bitchwhiniest complaints I frequently see online about coding interviews is how dare hiring managers ask you to prove you understood CS201 Data Structures & Algorithms…
I’ve been a computer programmer for 15 years, Not once have I ever been in such a time crunch that I couldn’t double check something.
There's a big difference between double checking things occasionally, and needing to look up fundamental things. I've been a sysadmin for, well, a long time, and there have been many occasions where I've been pulled in to rescue a situation and had to rely on what I knew, without being able to refer to other material, either due to intense time pressure, or enough being down that there isn't anything to reference.
Besides, exams should be testing your core understanding of the subject, the sort of knowledge everything else is built on, and your ability to apply that knowledge in different scenarios. Practical tests, are better suited to assessing how you use novel information, do more advanced things, and handle reference material. Maybe we're talking about the same sort of thing in different ways?
I think both closed book exams, and practical tests/discussions and the like have an important role to play in assessing your performance, whether a teacher sets them or you challenge yourself.
I think the difference here is we’re disagreeing on your first sentence. I disagree that needing to look up fundamental things is different than double checking. For instance off the top of my head I don’t remember if C# uses a case statement or a switch statement. But I know what those are and how to use them. I also have a fundamental disagreement with the idea that you could ever be in too much of a time crunch to not have to look something up. I’ve worked at hospitals and literally had lives on the line based on what I was doing and still felt like I had the time to make sure that what I was doing was correct.
At the end of the day, I personally feel that it’s more important that one have a general understanding of their subject and an ability to confirm their understanding of that subject quickly then simply memorizing facts.
This is one of those “you won’t need it, but the smart kids will” things.
I’ve used Pythagoras at least four times in my professional life, and not one of those occasions was the problem presented to me in the form of a neat “Here is a right-angled triangle; what is the length of this hypotenuse?” that I could have then looked up in response if I didn’t already know.
Right, but that’s not the point I’m trying to make. The point I’m trying to make is during any of those times was there a point in which you couldn’t look up what the Pythagorean formula was?
I feel like you haven’t understood my point either. If I didn’t already know Pythagoras, I wouldn’t have known that it was a valid solution to the problem I had, therefore I wouldn’t have known to look it up.
No, that was literally my point. That it’s more important to know how to find information and where the correct information is then it is to memorize the exact information. Knowing Pythagoras and having the formula memorized are two very different things especially for things that get more complicated than Pythagoras.
Getting what? You’ve literally just been saying the same thing I have except you seem to be under some weird insistence that knowing Pythagoras means having the formula memorized even though I’m talking about more general than just Pythagoras or even math formulas. You are the one who brought up Pythagoras in the first place. But sure, calling me thick seems like a great way to end this conversation. Bye.