Homework is not to measure anything is to force you to make the work so your brain develops new connections.
Using AI for homework or study is like bringing a forklift to the gym.
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
Homework is not to measure anything is to force you to make the work so your brain develops new connections.
Using AI for homework or study is like bringing a forklift to the gym.
I suspect a large part of the problem is that, at least in my experience, this is not at all explained to students and often the teachers themselves do it as "something that everybody does" rather than with the understanding that there is an underlying purposed that homework is meant to serve (which sould inform the when, what, how and how much of homework).
If see a similar kind of problem in my area (Software Development) all the time - people doing certain things because "they're good practices", "it's what you're supposed to do" or even "that's what everybody does" without at all understanding the underlying reasons for doing it (and, more importantly, when to do it, when not to do it and how best to do it), which is why for example nowadays you have countless of "Agile" teams that are doing wrong or unecessary (in their context) parts of it whilst not doing the parts that the should do just doing things they think they're supposed to do it but doing them incorrectly since they don't get what those things are supposed to achieve and how.
Mind you, some people are just lazy, so some students will just "optimize away" homework with whatever tools they have to do so, even when knowing the purpose of homework and when being given the most learning-enhancing homework possible.
Being able to use exercise equipment with a forklift would be pretty cool tho
To be fair, you'd have to develop mad forklift skills to do anything outside of deadlifts.
That sounds way more fun
Going to a gym to pose as doing exercise while not doing it? Yeah fun.
Bringing a forklift to the gym and trying to pick up all the different shapped weights.
I just spent the afternoon driving 79" helical Piles with a dingo for a solar array, the n grated the land, and since I had an extra hour with the machine , helped landscaping crew on site dig out a trench to plant hedges.
Easily the most fun ive had at work in a month.
Sure, but within the simile that's sitting at the back of the class and laughing with your friends instead of engaging with the lesson. Fun but you didn't gain anything and got in the way of people actually trying.
Yar well, in this situation school is for the muscles. Might be fun but it won't make you stronger
exams ... can be fooled by plausible-sounding bullshit
Maybe in the soft sciences, but try passing organic chem. 3 or chemical reactor design with plausible-sounding bullshit.
And even that doesn't matter: ChatGPT can pass a university-level physics exam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBtfwa-Fexc
Non scholae sed vitae discimus - a student who does their homework with LLMs has learned nothing.
Yes, but, if you can’t produce plausible bullshit on your own you’re not going to get very far.
if 90% of jobs can be replaced by AI bullshit, why tf do we even need to work? Why shape society so you must do shitty non existent jobs to survive?
May I introduce you to the work of David Graeber on this exact subject? Bullshit Jobs
Automation should enable UBI, in a decent society. But since our current leaders will never implement UBI, automation is a crime against the working class who need jobs to survive.
Correct answer, we are already in the UBI realm of not needing enough workers. The question is where the world goes from here. I'm currently betting on some dystopian societal structure we're 90% of people are fucked. So glad I'm older without kids.
if 90% of jobs can be replaced by AI bullshit
Well, to start, they can't.
At least not by these LLMs that keep getting touted as AI.
You are right because 90% of workers are not middle management!
The thing that this person seems to have either forgotten, or not understood in the first place, is that homework, and your education in general, is not for the teacher, it's for you. If you choose to cheat your way through you will gain less than if you actually put the work in yourself. This gets more important the further through education you go.
Probably the best outcome for an essay question is if you discuss it with your friends, all share your understanding of the subject, then write it up individually, incorporating anything new you learned from your discussions.
This does come with the issue that those who cheat could end up getting good grades if there is no 'live' check of their understanding, either through closed book exams, class tests, group discussions, or similar.
When I am struggling with Language Arts and excelling at Math, the extra time spent on unmastered Language homework benefits me. The extra time spent on Math serves only to waste my time and distract me from the Language work that needs my central focus.
The intention of homework is to benefit the student. The reality is that most students would be best served by skipping the homework and getting some exercise instead.
In the gradebook, the unit test score should be the floor for all homework scores in that unit. Score a 95% on the test, and even if you turn in zero homework, a 95% should be recorded for each assignment. S
Turn in 95% on each and every homework assignment, but score a 65% on the test? You keep your 95% scores showing you put in the work, even though you clearly haven't mastered the material.
Turn in no homework, and score a 65% on the test? Every homework assignment is now a 65%.
With this system, doing the homework can only help you. Skipping the homework is risky, but allowable.
Indeed, it's not that LLM is totally uncorrelated to factual basis, it is correlated well enough for most educational fodder that is supremely well trodden and doesn't seek surprises. It's practice with backgrounds the teachers can actually already know and credibly provide feedback on. It's so well known that any teacher knows, so it's correlated with AI output that has been trained on verbatim prompts and essays that are on the exact same topic, and so the narrative correlated with the prompt is just very likely to also correlate to the facts of relevance.
Just like a pocket calculator can make short work of elementary school math. It's not that we expect those kids to do some crazy novel stuff that calculators can't do, it's just that they need to operate in a context to actually illustrate they have the foundational understanding.
your education in general, is not for the teacher, it's for you
Most teachers don’t understand that
As I see it, teachers should make sure that students know the purposed of homework and how it is supposed to help them learn, and then homework should just be optional to complete, though for the psychological effect homework completion should checked and lauded and people should get feedback on it.
Mind you, this only really makes sense for students old enough to actually understand an explanation of the purpose of homework and how it helps learning.
Always has been...
I had Latin in school, and the teacher was a bit senile already. He started making the rounds to check our homework - which I had not done. So I just hastily scribbled some lines of gibberish into my notebook. He came to my place, looked at my notes, and scolded me for my bad writing. And signed it off as done...
Non scholae sed vitae discimus!
Illigitimus non carborundum!
Lorem ipsum!
E pluribus unum!
Ecce, Romani!
Tepus fugit.
Cornelia et Flavia non quod ita vero sum.
Romanes eunt domus.
Semper fidelis tyrannosaurus
For my vitae, Latin has been rather useless in the last 40+ years since I got rid of it.
It was just the choice of the lesser evil back then: French with an asshole teacher or Latin with a demented one. At least the teacher I had at the end let me off with the equivalent of a D instead of an F.
Yeah but for real proof of understanding has always been a problem. One of the reasons generated text is so pernicious is because even in everyday life, it outwardly mimics all the signals of care and cognition.
To the main point: much smaller class sizes is how you solve this problem.
I mean this is exactly what all the kids who told me they loooved essay questions always said they liked about them.
same, they all love cheating, before AI they would mostly just copy paste eachother's work
and me the alone kid who actually wanted and cared about learning would be drown out in busy work to be done, get bad grades even though I did well in tests and exercises, simply because I failed to do the annoying boring homeowrk of writting an essay that we all know the teacher is not reading, that they just made thjs assigment to give students free grade points because they know that if they didn't half of the students would fail the class, they would go lenghts about how they were being nice by doing this, and yet screwing over me would never be mentioned, one of the few students that ever displayed any form of curiosity in class
My students can use a translator for every interaction they have forever, or they can do the homework and try to learn the language. Three guesses as to what’s actually easier in the end. Just because it can be done by a computer doesn’t mean there’s no reason for a human to learn it.
I hear you, but language class is actually a decent example. I met a language requirement of 2 years in high school. Then I turned around and completed the required two semesters in college, of the same language, starting over at the beginning. I don't know anything but the most elementary French.
In high school I did all the homework and felt lots of stress and really struggled. In college, I google translated my way through all the homework, phoned it in and same result, way less time and energy. So using the computer was actually easier in the end.
I'm probably never making it to France. Maybe not even Canada. You could argue it was still good for my brain to stretch in that way, but it was just never going to click for me and was a requirement regardless of my actual educational needs.
My single semester of sign language I actually picked up on decently and it tickled my brain in all kinds of ways, and I actually used it at work once to help a dude. No one's ever come into any of my workplaces speaking French (at least not yet)
That’s a totally different situation, to be fair. I’m teaching German to recent immigrants to Germany. They will be much, much better off if they know the language.
I don't think the point was anti-learning so much as it was anti-measurement
Though this doesn't seem like a valid application of TAS, I'll bite.
A calculator can do your math homework for you, but that doesn't mean the homework is useless. It means that if you don't follow the rules the work is useless. Just because something with no understanding can complete a task doesn't mean a human with no understanding can. It is built to test a human, not a computer, and it generally does so well enough provided the human is the one doing the work.
Yeah it's built to serve as practice and to leave you with the questions you need to ask the next day.
I get it. I hated homework in school and generally didn't do it. And a fair bit of it was busywork. But when I got to college I learned the hard way that if I didn't do my homework, I wouldn't really have the skills. It's easy to sit through classes daydreaming or even listening, and just not really understand how to do a thing.
i can tell you from experience that teachers are using it too lol, to create the homework
one of my university professors admitted that he used copilot to create some questions for our exams of that class 🙃
I tried it for my class, and the questions they come up with is boring, repetitive, and generic.
I feel very sorry for you that you need to endure that.
Yea, I saw LLMs try to ask me questions to test my knowledge (which I didn't request) and they were so bad, I was almost feeling second-hand embarassement. They would ask a rather obvious question, and provide a tip that was almost the answer itself.