this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
597 points (98.7% liked)

politics

31112 readers
2171 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What part of that do the rest of us not understand?

Self-evidently, you don't understand what I meant.

The Republicans did what they could to get Trump elected, but it rather obviously wouldn't have been enough by itself. If the DNC had nominated a candidate the voters actually wanted who had then run on a platform the voters actually wanted, Trump would have lost.

Therefore the DNC - the people most responsible for forcing through a candidate the people didn't want and for rejecting the platform the people wanted and instead running on the platform the oligarchs wanted - bear more responsibility for Trump's election than anyone else.

That's exactly what I meant, and I stand by it.

And before you go veering to your backup strawman - that doesn't in any way absolve the Republicans of anything. They're loathsome scum who nominated a jabbering psychopath who's overseen the most corrupt and destructive administration in US history.

But similarly, that doesnt change the fact that the Democrats could have stopped them, but the DNC fucked it up.

Because you lazily used non-specific yet all-encompassing language as hyperbole and in the process created a lie.

No - I didn't take you by the hand and walk you through my reasoning, and you then jumped to one of the currently most tediously regurgitated strawmen out there.

I’ve never had to call anyone else stupid for what I chose to write

Neither have I.

I have sometimes called them stupid for their piss-poor job of interpreting what I wrote though.

And here's a secret - I don't do that because I believe they actually are stupid - if I believed that, I'd silently pity them

I call people stupid just to needle them when they're actually pretentious pseudo-intellectuals who substitute fallacies for arguments.

but that’s the entirety of your post history.

Something something "all-encompassing language as hyperbole and in the process created a lie."