this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
1062 points (98.7% liked)

me_irl

7631 readers
3588 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 92 points 1 day ago (41 children)

I will play devil’s advocate and note that when you own a home you are responsible for all the costs of the house, not just the mortgage. I’ll see myself out.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Ain't that the truth. When you "own" a home, you're only one $15k disaster away from being homeless.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Slightly preferable to being rendered out of a home due to your landlord making a $15k investment disaster.

In the years I rented I had two (technically 3) homes get sold by a landlord needing the cash.

[–] shaztopher@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I’m glad I live somewhere with enough protections for renters that I would not lose my home if the landlord sold it to a new owner. It’s crazy to me that landlords in other places can just kick people out when they feel like it

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They can't just kick you out if you have a lease.

[–] shaztopher@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

Yeah but I believe in a lot of places they can choose to not renew your lease which is effectively the same thing?

[–] AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Based on your name, it's one of the German-speaking countries. While yes, the law is more in favor of tenants than landlords, here in Austria our landlord's way of kicking us out (because he wants to sell the place) is by not extending our befristet Mietvertrag. So now we have to buy our own because paying mortgage is cheaper than renting ¯\(ツ)

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

In my case at the time it was just an effect of being poor. At least one scenario I had a legal case, but I couldn't afford the costs to bring it forth and it would cost more in legal fees than the case was worth. I simply didn't have the time or resources, especially since I had to focus on moving and getting security deposits together so as to not be homeless.

The protections are there, they just are not for certain economic classes since there's an exploitable time window to operate within.

Yeah, I think here (Los Angeles) the only reason outside of breaking the lease you can be evicted is if the landlord wants to personally live in the home or it’s getting demolished.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)